Bug 444873 - Duplex shouldn't affect number of copies
Summary: Duplex shouldn't affect number of copies
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED DUPLICATE of bug 303401
Alias: None
Product: Fedora
Classification: Fedora
Component: cups
Version: rawhide
Hardware: All
OS: Linux
low
low
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: Tim Waugh
QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On:
Blocks:
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2008-05-01 13:07 UTC by Rodd Clarkson
Modified: 2008-05-02 13:33 UTC (History)
0 users

Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2008-05-02 13:33:33 UTC
Type: ---
Embargoed:


Attachments (Terms of Use)

Description Rodd Clarkson 2008-05-01 13:07:55 UTC
Description of problem:

I have a printer that can duplex.

If I print a single page 10 times with the duplexing on, I currently get 5
printed pages with the same page printed 10 time one on each side of the page.

What I should get is 10 printed pages with a copy of the page on one side.

Duplex shouldn't affect how many copies I get.  While I haven't tried the
following, I imagine that if I printed a 3 page document multiple times with
duplex on, I would get a mess of paper with the start of the document on the
back of the last page in every second case.


Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):

f9-preview

[rodd@localhost ~]$ rpm -qa | grep cups
cups-libs-1.3.7-1.fc9.i386
libgnomecups-0.2.3-3.fc9.i386
hal-cups-utils-0.6.16-3.fc9.i386
bluez-utils-cups-3.30-2.fc9.i386
cupsddk-drivers-1.2.3-4.fc9.i386
cups-1.3.7-1.fc9.i386
[rodd@localhost ~]$ 


How reproducible:

Very

Steps to Reproduce:
1. Print a 1 page document on a printer that can duplex.
2. Change the number of copies to more than 1

  
Actual results:

The same page is printed both sides


Expected results:

The same page should be printed on a new page for each copy.

Comment 1 Tim Waugh 2008-05-01 13:25:44 UTC
How exactly are you printing?  The application you are printing from makes a
difference.  Is it evince, openoffice, something else..?

Comment 2 Rodd Clarkson 2008-05-02 09:28:49 UTC
I was printing from evince in this case.

Comment 3 Rodd Clarkson 2008-05-02 09:32:32 UTC
Okay, I just tested OOo and it works as expected, however I noticed that the
printer still sucked the page back in, it just didn't print on the back side.

So, has this something to do with the application not sending two pages to the
printer (or more correctly, an even number of pages)?

Comment 4 Tim Waugh 2008-05-02 13:33:33 UTC
The printer will suck the page back in and flip it in order to have the pages in
the output tray the right way up. (Think about a document with n pages, n > 1
and n odd.)

Evince is a known offender with this.  Marking as a duplicate.

(Hey, someone other than me filing duplex-printing bugs!  Yay!)

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 303401 ***


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.