Bug 444938 - conga fails to create proper cluster.conf entries for gfs2 filesystem type
Summary: conga fails to create proper cluster.conf entries for gfs2 filesystem type
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED ERRATA
Alias: None
Product: Red Hat Enterprise Linux 5
Classification: Red Hat
Component: conga
Version: 5.3
Hardware: All
OS: Linux
low
medium
Target Milestone: rc
: ---
Assignee: Ryan McCabe
QA Contact:
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On:
Blocks:
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2008-05-02 05:23 UTC by Vedanta Barooah
Modified: 2009-04-16 22:59 UTC (History)
3 users (show)

Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2009-01-20 21:56:50 UTC
Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:


Attachments (Terms of Use)


Links
System ID Private Priority Status Summary Last Updated
Red Hat Product Errata RHBA-2009:0196 0 normal SHIPPED_LIVE conga bug-fix and enhancement update 2009-01-20 16:06:02 UTC

Description Vedanta Barooah 2008-05-02 05:23:26 UTC
Description of problem: when a new logical volume group is created using conga
of fstype gfs2 the cluster.conf clusterfs element is marked as gfs instead. due
to this misconfiguration gfs2 file systems fail to mount when services fail over
to other nodes. 


Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): luci-0.10.0-6.el5


How reproducible: 

Steps to Reproduce:
1. create a gfs2 lv
2. make it a resource
3. add the resource to a service
4. assign service to node
5. try failing over the service
  
Actual results: service failover failure due to node not being able to mount gfs
2 volume


Expected results: proper service failover

Additional info: can be corrected by changing fstype to gfs2 in cluster.conf

Comment 3 Tim Wilkinson 2008-10-14 18:42:02 UTC
Reproduced bug using luci-0.12.0.7.el5

Comment 4 Brian Brock 2008-12-16 23:28:32 UTC
bugfix verified in luci-0.12.1-7.el5, cluster.conf appears to be correct

Comment 6 errata-xmlrpc 2009-01-20 21:56:50 UTC
An advisory has been issued which should help the problem
described in this bug report. This report is therefore being
closed with a resolution of ERRATA. For more information
on therefore solution and/or where to find the updated files,
please follow the link below. You may reopen this bug report
if the solution does not work for you.

http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2009-0196.html


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.