Bug 445075 - bzip2 not mentioned as a dependency in iptables-1.3.5-1.2.1.src.rpm
Summary: bzip2 not mentioned as a dependency in iptables-1.3.5-1.2.1.src.rpm
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED ERRATA
Alias: None
Product: Red Hat Enterprise Linux 5
Classification: Red Hat
Component: rpm
Version: 5.0
Hardware: All
OS: Linux
low
medium
Target Milestone: rc
: ---
Assignee: Panu Matilainen
QA Contact:
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On: 454887
Blocks:
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2008-05-03 08:53 UTC by Gaurav Chaturvedi
Modified: 2009-01-20 20:49 UTC (History)
2 users (show)

Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2009-01-20 20:49:31 UTC
Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:


Attachments (Terms of Use)


Links
System ID Private Priority Status Summary Last Updated
Red Hat Product Errata RHBA-2009:0079 0 normal SHIPPED_LIVE rpm bug fix update 2009-01-20 16:04:16 UTC

Description Gaurav Chaturvedi 2008-05-03 08:53:51 UTC
bzip2 is not mentioned as a dependency for compiling iptables, in the spec file
for iptables-1.3.5-1.2.1.src.rpm

Comment 1 Thomas Woerner 2008-07-15 10:14:41 UTC
rpm-build should require bzip2. /usr/bin/bzip2 is used in the build process to
extract the source archive.

Assigning to rpm.

Comment 2 Panu Matilainen 2008-08-14 05:50:32 UTC
This gets fixed by the rpm rebase.

Comment 3 RHEL Program Management 2008-08-14 06:01:33 UTC
This request was evaluated by Red Hat Product Management for inclusion in a Red
Hat Enterprise Linux maintenance release.  Product Management has requested
further review of this request by Red Hat Engineering, for potential
inclusion in a Red Hat Enterprise Linux Update release for currently deployed
products.  This request is not yet committed for inclusion in an Update
release.

Comment 9 errata-xmlrpc 2009-01-20 20:49:31 UTC
An advisory has been issued which should help the problem
described in this bug report. This report is therefore being
closed with a resolution of ERRATA. For more information
on therefore solution and/or where to find the updated files,
please follow the link below. You may reopen this bug report
if the solution does not work for you.

http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2009-0079.html


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.