Bug 445539 - Routing not setup
Summary: Routing not setup
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED NOTABUG
Alias: None
Product: Fedora
Classification: Fedora
Component: NetworkManager-openvpn
Version: 9
Hardware: x86_64
OS: Linux
high
high
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: Christoph Höger
QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On:
Blocks:
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2008-05-07 14:06 UTC by Neal Becker
Modified: 2008-05-14 11:40 UTC (History)
2 users (show)

Fixed In Version:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2008-05-14 11:40:48 UTC
Type: ---
Embargoed:


Attachments (Terms of Use)

Description Neal Becker 2008-05-07 14:06:27 UTC
Description of problem:
I setup openvpn using 
'only use vpn for 10.4.0.0/8'

/sbin/route -n
 /sbin/route -n
Kernel IP routing table
Destination     Gateway         Genmask         Flags Metric Ref    Use Iface
68.236.246.212  10.32.112.1     255.255.255.255 UGH   0      0        0 eth0
10.32.112.0     0.0.0.0         255.255.255.0   U     0      0        0 eth0
0.0.0.0         10.32.112.1     0.0.0.0         UG    0      0        0 eth0

This seems to have broken with today's update.  As you see, no route for
10.4.0.0 was entered.
Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
rpm -q NetworkManager-openvpn
NetworkManager-openvpn-0.7.0-10.svn3632.fc9.x86_64

How reproducible:


Steps to Reproduce:
1.
2.
3.
  
Actual results:


Expected results:


Additional info:

Comment 1 Christoph Höger 2008-05-14 07:43:25 UTC
Hi Neal,

if I try what you did, I get an 

May 14 09:41:51 choeger4 NetworkManager: <WARN> 
nm_system_device_add_ip4_route_via_device_with_iface(): rtnl_route_add()
returned error Unknown error 4294967274 (-22)#012Missing link name TLV (errno =
Invalid argument)

error. What is 10.4.0.0/8 supposed to match? shouldn't that be 10.4.0.0/16 or
10.0.0.0/8 ?

regards

Chistoph

Comment 2 Bug Zapper 2008-05-14 10:46:18 UTC
Changing version to '9' as part of upcoming Fedora 9 GA.
More information and reason for this action is here:
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BugZappers/HouseKeeping

Comment 3 Neal Becker 2008-05-14 11:40:48 UTC
Ah yes, I had that inverted.  Should have been 10.4.0.0/24


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.