+++ This bug was initially created as a clone of Bug #433341 +++ Escalated to Bugzilla from IssueTracker -- Additional comment from tao on 2008-02-18 14:14 EST -- Description of problem: Customer is getting following error messages:- <snip> 1568 Mar 15 13:16:57 evebe666 kernel: EDAC k8 MC0: GART TLB errorr: transaction type(generic), cache level(generic) 1569 Mar 15 13:16:57 evebe666 kernel: EDAC k8 MC0: extended error code: GART error <snip> There is is typo in the messages. Actual results: In the messages we see following:- "errorr: transaction type....." Expected results: It should be "error: transaction type...." Additional info: In the source of "2.6.9-67" kernel I see following in "drivers/edac/k8_edac.c" file. <snip> k8_mc_printk(mci, KERN_ERR, "GART TLB errorr: transaction type(%s), " "cache level(%s)\\n", tt_msgs[ec_tt], ll_msgs[ec_ll]); <snip> This event sent from IssueTracker by streeter [SEG - Kernel] issue 164579 -- Additional comment from streeter on 2008-02-18 14:15 EST -- This code comes from the linux-2.6.9-edac.patch in the RHEL4 kernel. It does not appear to be in the upstream kernel. -- Additional comment from arozansk on 2008-04-15 12:10 EST -- Created an attachment (id=302487) test patch Upstream (on bluesmoke project) patch.
This request was evaluated by Red Hat Product Management for inclusion in a Red Hat Enterprise Linux maintenance release. Product Management has requested further review of this request by Red Hat Engineering, for potential inclusion in a Red Hat Enterprise Linux Update release for currently deployed products. This request is not yet committed for inclusion in an Update release.
in kernel-2.6.18-98.el5 You can download this test kernel from http://people.redhat.com/dzickus/el5
An advisory has been issued which should help the problem described in this bug report. This report is therefore being closed with a resolution of ERRATA. For more information on therefore solution and/or where to find the updated files, please follow the link below. You may reopen this bug report if the solution does not work for you. http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2009-0225.html