Note: This bug is displayed in read-only format because the product is no longer active in Red Hat Bugzilla.

For bugs related to Red Hat Enterprise Linux 5 product line. The current stable release is 5.10. For Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6 and above, please visit Red Hat JIRA https://issues.redhat.com/secure/CreateIssue!default.jspa?pid=12332745 to report new issues.

Bug 446249

Summary:	CIFS: clear DFS bit in header_assemble
Product:	Red Hat Enterprise Linux 5	Reporter:	Jeff Layton <jlayton>
Component:	kernel	Assignee:	Jeff Layton <jlayton>
Status:	CLOSED DUPLICATE	QA Contact:	Martin Jenner <mjenner>
Severity:	medium	Docs Contact:
Priority:	medium
Version:	5.2	CC:	sputhenp, ssorce, steved
Target Milestone:	rc
Target Release:	---
Hardware:	All
OS:	Linux
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version:		Doc Type:	Bug Fix
Doc Text:		Story Points:	---
Clone Of:		Environment:
Last Closed:	2008-08-08 15:04:52 UTC	Type:	---
Regression:	---	Mount Type:	---
Documentation:	---	CRM:
Verified Versions:		Category:	---
oVirt Team:	---	RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team:	---	Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:
Bug Depends On:
Bug Blocks:	447413

Description Jeff Layton 2008-05-13 18:02:47 UTC

CIFS in RHEL5.2 does not support DFS, but it's falsely advertising that it does.
The header_assemble() function sets the bit if the server supports it. we need
to turn that off.

Comment 1 RHEL Program Management 2008-06-19 14:24:38 UTC

This request was evaluated by Red Hat Product Management for inclusion in a Red
Hat Enterprise Linux maintenance release.  Product Management has requested
further review of this request by Red Hat Engineering, for potential
inclusion in a Red Hat Enterprise Linux Update release for currently deployed
products.  This request is not yet committed for inclusion in an Update
release.

Comment 3 Jeff Layton 2008-08-08 15:04:52 UTC

I'm going to close this bug as a duplicate of bug 453462. It looks like I'll probably be shipping DFS support for RHEL5.3, so we don't really need to fix this after all...

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 453462 ***