Hide Forgot
Spec URL: http://stahnma.fedorapeople.org/reviews/rubygem-rspec.spec SRPM URL: http://stahnma.fedorapeople.org/reviews/rubygem-rspec-1.1.3-1.fc8.src.rpm Description: RSpec is a behaviour driven development (BDD) framework for Ruby. RSpec was created in response to Dave Astels' article _A New Look at Test Driven Development_ which can be read at: http://daveastels.com/index.php?p=5 RSpec is intended to provide the features discussed in Dave's article. Note: I know rpmlint is not clean, but I wanted discussion on it. The upstream gem ships 3 zero-byte files. Also, there are 2 ruby files that the gem includes as 644 perms, and it's fine to leave them this way, but rpmlint doesn't like it.
Spec URL: http://stahnma.fedorapeople.org/reviews/rubygem-rspec.spec SRPM : http://stahnma.fedorapeople.org/reviews/rubygem-rspec-1.1.8-1.fc9.src.rpm New version
You need the ruby(abi) requires and the ruby buildrequires
Doesn't requiring rubygems imply that it requires ruby? It would seem that requiring another package that requires these things should be ok.
I updated the srpm either way; it's not a difficult update. It doesn't make a ton of sense to me, but the packaging guidelines appear to concur with you. http://stahnma.fedorapeople.org/reviews/rubygem-rspec.spec http://stahnma.fedorapeople.org/reviews/rubygem-rspec-1.1.8-2.fc9.src.rpm
The buildrequires doesn't need to be ruby(abi), just ruby. For the requires, you have to specify the abi version. ruby(abi) = 1.8 I assume
http://stahnma.fedorapeople.org/reviews/rubygem-rspec.spec http://stahnma.fedorapeople.org/reviews/rubygem-rspec-1.1.8-3.fc9.src.rpm
Looks all right to me. Do you need sponsorship?
Nope, he's already in the packager group.
Looks good to me.
New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: rubygem-rspec Short Description: Behaviour Driven Development framework for Ruby Owners: stahnma Branches: F-8, F-9, F-10, EL-5 InitialCC:
CVS Done
rubygem-rspec-1.1.11-1.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/rubygem-rspec-1.1.11-1.fc10
rubygem-rspec-1.1.11-1.fc9 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 9. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/rubygem-rspec-1.1.11-1.fc9
rubygem-rspec-1.1.11-1.fc8 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 8. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/rubygem-rspec-1.1.11-1.fc8
rubygem-rspec-1.1.11-1.fc8 has been pushed to the Fedora 8 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update rubygem-rspec'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F8/FEDORA-2008-9741
rubygem-rspec-1.1.11-1.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update rubygem-rspec'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F9/FEDORA-2008-9792
rubygem-rspec-1.1.11-1.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update rubygem-rspec'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/f10/FEDORA-2008-10000
rubygem-rspec-1.1.11-1.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
rubygem-rspec-1.1.11-1.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
rubygem-rspec-1.1.11-1.fc8 has been pushed to the Fedora 8 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.