Bug 448104 - corrupt glyph positions with large font
Summary: corrupt glyph positions with large font
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED RAWHIDE
Alias: None
Product: Fedora
Classification: Fedora
Component: cairo
Version: rawhide
Hardware: All
OS: Linux
low
low
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: Behdad Esfahbod
QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On:
Blocks:
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2008-05-23 14:11 UTC by Caolan McNamara
Modified: 2008-08-24 03:47 UTC (History)
1 user (show)

Fixed In Version:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2008-08-24 03:47:10 UTC
Type: ---
Embargoed:


Attachments (Terms of Use)
screen shot (25.39 KB, image/png)
2008-05-23 14:11 UTC, Caolan McNamara
no flags Details
test case (6.09 KB, text/plain)
2008-05-23 14:12 UTC, Caolan McNamara
no flags Details

Description Caolan McNamara 2008-05-23 14:11:48 UTC
Attached is a test-case boiled out of OpenOffice.org and bolted onto the xlib
cairo-demo. It attempt to render the string MoWoW and the string MWooW with a
very large Liberation Serif font. And the screenshot shows the results. Unless
I'm being very slow today (always possible) there is something terribly screwed
up going on. 

cairo-1.6.4-1.fc9.i386
I see this both with a i810 driver and a nv driver.

Comment 1 Caolan McNamara 2008-05-23 14:11:48 UTC
Created attachment 306499 [details]
screen shot

Comment 2 Caolan McNamara 2008-05-23 14:12:59 UTC
Created attachment 306500 [details]
test case

Comment 3 Carl Worth (Ampere) 2008-05-23 14:54:06 UTC
I've replicated this bug with the r100 driver as well. So it appears to be
a fairly generic cairo-xlib or X server bug. Note that the bug does not appear
when rendering to a cairo image surface. Also, the bug is present with at least
both of "Liberation Sans" and "Bitstream Vera Sans".

-Carl


Comment 4 Carl Worth (Ampere) 2008-05-23 15:06:33 UTC
I've also added a new large-font test to cairo's test suite to exercise this bug.

It also verifies that all backends other than cairo-xlib pass the test.

-Carl


Comment 5 Behdad Esfahbod 2008-05-23 17:58:43 UTC
Isn't this the bug reported here:
http://lists.cairographics.org/archives/cairo/2008-May/014033.html


Comment 6 Carl Worth (Ampere) 2008-05-23 19:17:53 UTC
(In reply to comment #5)
> Isn't this the bug reported here:
> http://lists.cairographics.org/archives/cairo/2008-May/014033.html

Could be. I hadn't done any analysis of that one, so hadn't remembered it.

No fix yet?

Behdad, does Vlad's suggestion sound right?

I'm still looking close to try to understand this one myself. Where is
the glyph data getting shuffled for example?

-Carl


Comment 7 Behdad Esfahbod 2008-05-23 20:25:57 UTC
Vlad's fix doesn't work:
http://lists.cairographics.org/archives/cairo/2008-May/014044.html

I'll fix this today, perhaps using what I suggest in the above URL.

Comment 8 Behdad Esfahbod 2008-05-24 00:19:53 UTC
I've pushed a couple fixes to cairo master now.  Please test.

Comment 9 Caolan McNamara 2008-05-24 13:02:05 UTC
Yes latest git version works just right for me

Comment 10 Matthias Clasen 2008-08-24 03:47:10 UTC
That probably means we can close this bug now, with cairo 1.7.4 in rawhide.


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.