Bug 448703 - New L.ROOT-SERVERS.NET IP address
Summary: New L.ROOT-SERVERS.NET IP address
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED ERRATA
Alias: None
Product: Red Hat Enterprise Linux 4
Classification: Red Hat
Component: caching-nameserver
Version: 4.6
Hardware: All
OS: Linux
high
medium
Target Milestone: rc
: ---
Assignee: Adam Tkac
QA Contact:
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On:
Blocks: 451949
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2008-05-28 11:03 UTC by Tomas Hoger
Modified: 2013-04-30 23:39 UTC (History)
2 users (show)

Fixed In Version: RHBA-2008-0560
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2008-06-18 16:38:39 UTC
Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:


Attachments (Terms of Use)


Links
System ID Private Priority Status Summary Last Updated
Red Hat Product Errata RHBA-2008:0560 0 normal SHIPPED_LIVE caching-nameserver bug fix update 2008-06-24 18:19:30 UTC

Description Tomas Hoger 2008-05-28 11:03:32 UTC
One of the DNS root servers -- L.ROOT-SERVERS.NET -- has changed it's IP address
recently from 198.32.64.12 to 199.7.83.42.  Current versions of
caching-nameserver configuration-only packages in Red Hat Enterprise Linux 2.1,
3 and 4 include old IP address in the named.ca root zone file.

Updated root zone file can be obtained from:

  ftp://ftp.internic.com/domain/named.root

This change attracted attention due to an occurrence of the multiple
unauthorized DNS servers operating with the old IP address.  This raised
concerns regarding possible misuse of the old IP by some malicious DNS server,
even though no such misuse was confirmed so far:

  http://www.renesys.com/blog/2008/05/identity_theft_hits_the_root_n_1.shtml

For further discussion, see bug #363541.

Comment 8 errata-xmlrpc 2008-06-18 16:38:39 UTC
An advisory has been issued which should help the problem
described in this bug report. This report is therefore being
closed with a resolution of ERRATA. For more information
on therefore solution and/or where to find the updated files,
please follow the link below. You may reopen this bug report
if the solution does not work for you.

http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2008-0560.html


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.