+++ This bug was initially created as a clone of Bug #442897 +++ Description of problem: When irq runs on a system with two cpus, it quickly exits not reporting any reason as to why. Practically speaking, irqbalance doesn't have much work to do on a system that has only one cache domain and it's job is to spread irq's across the available domains in the system. However, this will cause confusion in the minority of our customers and will trigger some support calls. To avoid confusion I propose documentation that describes expected behavior on systems with only one cache domain and possibly a pointer to the documentation @ the irqbalance project page. Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): 0.55-10.el5 How reproducible: 100% Steps to Reproduce: 1. Run irqbalance on a system with <= 2 cpus or 1 cache domain 2. Check daemon status after a few seconds 3. Actual results: Program exits Expected results: Continues to run or report it has nothing to do. Additional info: -- Additional comment from nhorman on 2008-04-17 10:36 EST -- concur. I'll update the docs for 5.3 -- Additional comment from pm-rhel on 2008-06-02 16:05 EST -- This request was evaluated by Red Hat Product Management for inclusion in a Red Hat Enterprise Linux maintenance release. Product Management has requested further review of this request by Red Hat Engineering, for potential inclusion in a Red Hat Enterprise Linux Update release for currently deployed products. This request is not yet committed for inclusion in an Update release.
This bug appears to have been reported against 'rawhide' during the Fedora 10 development cycle. Changing version to '10'. More information and reason for this action is here: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BugZappers/HouseKeeping
This message is a reminder that Fedora 10 is nearing its end of life. Approximately 30 (thirty) days from now Fedora will stop maintaining and issuing updates for Fedora 10. It is Fedora's policy to close all bug reports from releases that are no longer maintained. At that time this bug will be closed as WONTFIX if it remains open with a Fedora 'version' of '10'. Package Maintainer: If you wish for this bug to remain open because you plan to fix it in a currently maintained version, simply change the 'version' to a later Fedora version prior to Fedora 10's end of life. Bug Reporter: Thank you for reporting this issue and we are sorry that we may not be able to fix it before Fedora 10 is end of life. If you would still like to see this bug fixed and are able to reproduce it against a later version of Fedora please change the 'version' of this bug to the applicable version. If you are unable to change the version, please add a comment here and someone will do it for you. Although we aim to fix as many bugs as possible during every release's lifetime, sometimes those efforts are overtaken by events. Often a more recent Fedora release includes newer upstream software that fixes bugs or makes them obsolete. The process we are following is described here: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BugZappers/HouseKeeping
Fedora 10 changed to end-of-life (EOL) status on 2009-12-17. Fedora 10 is no longer maintained, which means that it will not receive any further security or bug fix updates. As a result we are closing this bug. If you can reproduce this bug against a currently maintained version of Fedora please feel free to reopen this bug against that version. Thank you for reporting this bug and we are sorry it could not be fixed.