Spec URL: http://jkeating.fedorapeople.org/review/rubygem-tiddlywiki_cp.spec SRPM URL: http://jkeating.fedorapeople.org/review/rubygem-tiddlywiki_cp-0.5.3-1.fc9.src.rpm Description: Copy tiddlywiki tiddlers to files and vice versa. This was generated with gem2spec. The rpmlint errors about zero length stuff I do believe is OK because it's part of the test/example stuff. However I'm in communication with upstream to clarify.
It is easier to understand what you are writing about the rpmlint output, if you also attach it: rubygem-tiddlywiki_cp.noarch: E: non-executable-script /usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/tiddlywiki_cp-0.5.3/scripts/txt2html 0644 Don't you get this error? rubygem-tiddlywiki_cp.noarch: E: zero-length /usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/tiddlywiki_cp-0.5.3/test/content/ignored# rubygem-tiddlywiki_cp.noarch: E: zero-length /usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/tiddlywiki_cp-0.5.3/test/content/a rubygem-tiddlywiki_cp.noarch: E: zero-length /usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/tiddlywiki_cp-0.5.3/test/content/d/CVS rubygem-tiddlywiki_cp.noarch: E: zero-length /usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/tiddlywiki_cp-0.5.3/test/content/b rubygem-tiddlywiki_cp.noarch: E: zero-length /usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/tiddlywiki_cp-0.5.3/test/content/a.div My rpmbuild also complains, that some files are mentioned multiple times in %files: %{gemdir}/gems/%{gemname}-%{version}/ %doc %{geminstdir}/README.txt The first path already includes the second one, because at the beginning of the spec, %geminstdir is defined as follows: %define geminstdir %{gemdir}/gems/%{gemname}-%{version} Or in other words: %{gemdir}/gems/%{gemname}-%{version}/ can be directly written as %{geminstdir}/ in %files. From the Review Guidelines: | - MUST: A package must not contain any duplicate files in the %files listing. - Btw. the e-mail address in %changelog is probably only valid on your local machine.
Are you still interested in a review?
Sorry, no, it is no longer necessary for building the package I was working on.