Description of problem: Compatibility packages provided by jpackage.org have no effect. For example, package java-1.5.0-sun-compat-1.5.0.14-1jpp.i586.rpm , can be installed, but produces no effect, i.e. it doesnt add java-1.5.0-sun to /usr/sbin/alternatives. Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): Version : 1.7.5 Release : 1jpp.1.fc9 How reproducible: Always Steps to Reproduce: 1. Install jdk-1_5_0_14-linux-i586.rpm provided by Sun at java.sun.com 2. Install java-1.5.0-sun-compat.i586 0:1.5.0.14-1jpp provided by jpackage.org I receive the following warning about javaws link when I install (dont know if this is the culprit). rpm -ivh java-1.5.0-sun-compat-1.5.0.14-1jpp.i586.rpm warning: java-1.5.0-sun-compat-1.5.0.14-1jpp.i586.rpm: Header V3 DSA signature: NOKEY, key ID c431416d Preparing... ########################################### [100%] 1:java-1.5.0-sun-compat ########################################### [100%] link /usr/bin/javaws incorrect for slave javaws (/usr/share/javaws javaws) 3. /usr/sbin/alternatives --config java Actual results: The sun vm option is not shown. *+ 1 /usr/lib/jvm/jre-1.6.0-openjdk/bin/java 2 /usr/lib/jvm/jre-1.5.0-gcj/bin/java Expected results: The sun vm should be one of the options listed. Additional info: I have used exactly the same procedure to install those same versions of packages in Fedora 8 and RHEL 5 and succeeded. something changed for fedora 9 that broke compatibility with jpackage compat packages.
This seems like an alternatives bug. If an attempt is made to install a link with the same name as a previously-installed link, but a different primary path, then the entire alternatives --install invocation will fail. A better response would be to not install only the affected slave symlink. What changed in Fedora 9: javaws should not be installed as /usr/share/javaws, it should go in /usr/lib/jvm/java-$version-$vendor/jre/bin. We've fixed that in F9's java-1.6.0-openjdk packages. This fix, combined with alternatives' behaviour, cause the conflict with these older JPackage packages.
Just to add, I tried it with the latest jdk-compat package from jpackage (java-1.6.0-sun-compat-1.6.0.06-1jpp.i586.rpm), the behavior remains the same -- javaws conflict and no installation of the links.
This message is a reminder that Fedora 9 is nearing its end of life. Approximately 30 (thirty) days from now Fedora will stop maintaining and issuing updates for Fedora 9. It is Fedora's policy to close all bug reports from releases that are no longer maintained. At that time this bug will be closed as WONTFIX if it remains open with a Fedora 'version' of '9'. Package Maintainer: If you wish for this bug to remain open because you plan to fix it in a currently maintained version, simply change the 'version' to a later Fedora version prior to Fedora 9's end of life. Bug Reporter: Thank you for reporting this issue and we are sorry that we may not be able to fix it before Fedora 9 is end of life. If you would still like to see this bug fixed and are able to reproduce it against a later version of Fedora please change the 'version' of this bug to the applicable version. If you are unable to change the version, please add a comment here and someone will do it for you. Although we aim to fix as many bugs as possible during every release's lifetime, sometimes those efforts are overtaken by events. Often a more recent Fedora release includes newer upstream software that fixes bugs or makes them obsolete. The process we are following is described here: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BugZappers/HouseKeeping
I just now encountered this bug in Fedora 11. I was trying to install java-1.6.0-sun-compat-1.6.0.06-1jpp.i586.rpm obtained from ftp://jpackage.hmdc.harvard.edu/JPackage/1.7/generic/RPMS.non-free/. Is there a work around? I do not seem to have the privileges necessary to change the 'version' of this bug as recommended in the previous post.
For others who experience this bug in the interim, I found this nosrc rpm on the web: http://ryu.zarb.org/~jasonc/packages/java-1.6.0-sun-1.6.0.13-2jpp.nosrc.rpm It does work with Fedora 11. You can find instructions for installing nosrc rpms on the jpackage website: http://www.jpackage.org/nosrc.php I found this "spec" file to require jdk-6u13-linux-x64.bin obtainable from: http://java.sun.com/products/archive/ (don't execute this jdk binary directly - rather, you put it in a special folder under a directory structure that is created by the "nosrc" rpm and then run the "rpmbuild" command which repackages the binary as a set of rpms). The directory structure containing the "spec" file may be found somewhere under /usr/src or ~/rpm or ~/rpmbuild depending on how your system is configured. gb
Sorry about the delays. I've looked at this some; it's not really a simple fix. If you take the route in comment #1 (do not install that particular slave), you're likely to end up with a broken system. After all, if the app is using that path, it likely expects that path, not whatever path the other alternatives-using app uses. Furthermore, there's no good way to determine which is 'more' correct; it really boils down to which app was installed first - if you installed the Sun JDK first, you'd get the error on installing OpenJDK. Hence, throwing an error seems the right thing to do here.