Bug 451627
| Summary: | spamd processes blocked, "prefork: select returned -1! recovering: Bad file descriptor" | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | Red Hat Enterprise Linux 4 | Reporter: | David Tonhofer <bughunt> | ||||
| Component: | spamassassin | Assignee: | Petr Lautrbach <plautrba> | ||||
| Status: | CLOSED WONTFIX | QA Contact: | qe-baseos-daemons | ||||
| Severity: | low | Docs Contact: | |||||
| Priority: | low | ||||||
| Version: | 4.8 | CC: | radu | ||||
| Target Milestone: | rc | ||||||
| Target Release: | --- | ||||||
| Hardware: | All | ||||||
| OS: | Linux | ||||||
| Whiteboard: | |||||||
| Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | Bug Fix | |||||
| Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |||||
| Clone Of: | Environment: | ||||||
| Last Closed: | 2012-06-20 16:04:23 UTC | Type: | --- | ||||
| Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- | ||||
| Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |||||
| Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |||||
| oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |||||
| Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |||||
| Embargoed: | |||||||
| Attachments: |
|
||||||
|
Description
David Tonhofer
2008-06-16 09:55:48 UTC
Created attachment 309476 [details]
Lines of "spamd" left in the mail syloglog (extract)
It looks like this was fixed in spamassassin-3.2.0. RHEL4 has spamassassin-3.2.4-1.el4.1 yet you still have this problem? I personally use spamassassin on CentOS systems and CentOS has spamassassin-3.1.9-1.el4. I was not aware until now of this version mismatch. I don't know if the reporter is running CentOS too or he is using an older RHEL4 release. If he uses RHEL4, the issue, as you said, should be already fixed if he upgrades. Original reporter here. As indicated, this is a RHEL4 with a 3.1.9-1.el4.1. Version 3.2.4 is indeed out, so it's time to upgrade. Thank you for submitting this issue for consideration in Red Hat Enterprise Linux. The release for which you requested us to review is now End of Life. Please See https://access.redhat.com/support/policy/updates/errata/ If you would like Red Hat to re-consider your feature request for an active release, please re-open the request via appropriate support channels and provide additional supporting details about the importance of this issue. |