Bug 451915 - Can't install multilib packages using GNOME PackageKit
Summary: Can't install multilib packages using GNOME PackageKit
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED DUPLICATE of bug 443143
Alias: None
Product: Fedora
Classification: Fedora
Component: gnome-packagekit
Version: 9
Hardware: x86_64
OS: Linux
low
low
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: Robin Norwood
QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On:
Blocks:
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2008-06-18 04:16 UTC by Alex W. Jackson
Modified: 2008-07-15 14:33 UTC (History)
2 users (show)

Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2008-07-15 14:33:06 UTC
Type: ---
Embargoed:


Attachments (Terms of Use)

Description Alex W. Jackson 2008-06-18 04:16:42 UTC
Description of problem:
It seems to be impossible to use the GNOME PackageKit client to install the i386
version of a multilib package whose x86_64 version is already installed.  It
displays an error dialog saying "This package could not be installed as it is
already installed".

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
gnome-packagekit-0.1.12-12.20080430.fc9

How reproducible:
always

Steps to Reproduce:
1.Have, e.g., SDL.x86_64 installed, but not SDL.i386
2.Run GNOME PackageKit
3.Select i386 version of SDL from list of available packages
4.Click install

Actual results:
"This package could not be installed as it is already installed"

Expected results:
package installs

Additional info:
Dunno if the problem is with gnome-packagekit, or PackageKit itself, or even
further down the stack (yum?) as I can't be arsed to figure out pkcon
syntax--for now I've fallen back to manually downloading and installing using
rpm -i.

Comment 1 Richard Hughes 2008-06-23 10:15:46 UTC
Sure, I've not got a multilib box here so I can't test this. Could you try
rebuilding PackageKit from rawhide and trying that? Thanks.

Comment 2 Julian Sikorski 2008-07-15 14:16:21 UTC
This is probably a duplicate of #443143.

Comment 3 Alex W. Jackson 2008-07-15 14:33:06 UTC
Yes, it is.

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 443143 ***


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.