Bug 452105 (pear-Auth-RADIUS) - Review Request: php-pear-Auth-RADIUS - Wrapper Classes for the RADIUS PECL
Summary: Review Request: php-pear-Auth-RADIUS - Wrapper Classes for the RADIUS PECL
Alias: pear-Auth-RADIUS
Product: Fedora
Classification: Fedora
Component: Package Review
Version: rawhide
Hardware: All
OS: Linux
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: Jason Tibbitts
QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance
Depends On:
Blocks: php-pear-Auth
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
Reported: 2008-06-19 13:04 UTC by Christopher Stone
Modified: 2008-06-25 02:52 UTC (History)
3 users (show)

Fixed In Version: 1.0.6-1.fc9
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Clone Of:
Last Closed: 2008-06-25 02:52:32 UTC
Type: ---
tibbs: fedora-review+
kevin: fedora-cvs+

Attachments (Terms of Use)

Description Christopher Stone 2008-06-19 13:04:15 UTC
Spec URL: http://xulchris.fedorapeople.org/packages/php-pear-Auth-RADIUS.spec
SRPM URL: http://xulchris.fedorapeople.org/packages/php-pear-Auth-RADIUS-1.0.6-1.fc9.src.rpm

Wrapper Classes for the RADIUS PECL.

Comment 1 Jason Tibbitts 2008-06-21 22:35:58 UTC
Another trivial review; builds fine, rpmlint is silent and everything looks good
to me.

I assume you know that Requires(hint): is the same as Requires:, so this package
ends up depending on mcrypt, mhash, and Crypt-CHAP.  They're tiny, so I don't
see this as a problem, but I don't really see the point in just not using
regular dependencies.

* source files match upstream:
* package meets naming and versioning guidelines.
* specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently.
* summary is OK.
* description is OK.
* dist tag is present.
* build root is OK.
* license field matches the actual license.
* license is open source-compatible.
* license text not included (separately) upstream.
* latest version is being packaged.
* BuildRequires are proper.
* %clean is present.
* package builds in mock (rawhide, x86_64).
* package installs properly.
* rpmlint is silent.
* final provides and requires are sane:
   php-pear(Auth_RADIUS) = 1.0.6
   php-pear-Auth-RADIUS = 1.0.6-1.fc10
   php-pecl(radius) >= 1.2.5

* %check is not present; no test suite upstream.
* owns the directories it creates.
* doesn't own any directories it shouldn't.
* no duplicates in %files.
* file permissions are appropriate.
* code, not content.
* documentation is small, so no -doc subpackage is necessary.
* %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package.


Comment 2 Christopher Stone 2008-06-21 22:42:18 UTC
I use requires(hint) as a note to myself (or someone looking at the spec) that
the package is optional.  Kind of like a comment.  Thanks for the review.  :)

Comment 3 Christopher Stone 2008-06-21 22:45:05 UTC
New Package CVS Request
Package Name: php-pear-Auth-RADIUS
Short Description: Wrapper Classes for the RADIUS PECL
Owners: xulchris
Branches: EL-5 F-8 F-9
Cvsextras Commits: yes

Comment 4 Jason Tibbitts 2008-06-21 22:56:05 UTC
I would suggest that if you wish to include a comment in the spec, you simply
use a regular comment instead of using syntax which simply isn't defined in Fedora.

Comment 5 Kevin Fenzi 2008-06-22 15:56:05 UTC
cvs done.

Comment 6 Fedora Update System 2008-06-22 20:20:05 UTC
php-pear-Auth-RADIUS-1.0.6-1.fc9 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 9

Comment 7 Fedora Update System 2008-06-25 02:52:29 UTC
php-pear-Auth-RADIUS-1.0.6-1.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 stable repository.  If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.