Bug 452813 - pvdisplay of 250 luns with 4 paths each (1000 paths) takes many hours or days and consumes 4+GB of RAM
pvdisplay of 250 luns with 4 paths each (1000 paths) takes many hours or days...
Status: CLOSED ERRATA
Product: Red Hat Enterprise Linux 5
Classification: Red Hat
Component: lvm2 (Show other bugs)
5.2
All All
high Severity high
: rc
: ---
Assigned To: Milan Broz
Cluster QE
:
Depends On:
Blocks: 252420
  Show dependency treegraph
 
Reported: 2008-06-25 05:09 EDT by Milan Broz
Modified: 2013-02-28 23:06 EST (History)
12 users (show)

See Also:
Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2009-01-20 16:46:06 EST
Type: ---
Regression: ---
Mount Type: ---
Documentation: ---
CRM:
Verified Versions:
Category: ---
oVirt Team: ---
RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: ---


Attachments (Terms of Use)

  None (edit)
Description Milan Broz 2008-06-25 05:09:32 EDT
+++ This bug was initially created as a clone of Bug #261521 +++
RHEL5 clone

Basic issue is pvdisplay is taking an unreasonably long time and consuming an
unreasonably large amount of RAM.
...

-- Additional comment from mbroz@redhat.com on 2008-02-01 10:12 EST --
There are basically two steps to speed up this process we are working on
1) use internal cache for device labels
2) use internal cache for metadata areas

See also bug #426147 - [RFE] Load balancing of lvm metadata across pv's
Comment 1 RHEL Product and Program Management 2008-06-25 05:14:05 EDT
This request was evaluated by Red Hat Product Management for inclusion in a Red
Hat Enterprise Linux maintenance release.  Product Management has requested
further review of this request by Red Hat Engineering, for potential
inclusion in a Red Hat Enterprise Linux Update release for currently deployed
products.  This request is not yet committed for inclusion in an Update
release.
Comment 3 Milan Broz 2008-07-03 05:36:17 EDT
Commited to CVS in version lvm2-2.02.39-1.el5.
Comment 10 errata-xmlrpc 2009-01-20 16:46:06 EST
An advisory has been issued which should help the problem
described in this bug report. This report is therefore being
closed with a resolution of ERRATA. For more information
on therefore solution and/or where to find the updated files,
please follow the link below. You may reopen this bug report
if the solution does not work for you.

http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2009-0179.html

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.