Bug 453486 – grub in F8 is newer than F9; RPM version issue

Bug 453486 - grub in F8 is newer than F9; RPM version issue

Summary:	grub in F8 is newer than F9; RPM version issue

Status:	CLOSED DUPLICATE of bug 469486

Aliases:	None

Product:	Fedora
Classification:	Fedora
Component:	grub (Show other bugs)
Sub Component:
Version:	9
Hardware:	All Linux

Priority	low Severity low
Target Milestone:	---
Target Release:	---
Assigned To:	Peter Jones
QA Contact:	Fedora Extras Quality Assurance
Docs Contact:

URL:
Whiteboard:
Keywords:

Depends On:
Blocks:
	Show dependency tree / graph

Reported:	2008-06-30 18:59 EDT by Stephen Warren
Modified:	2009-03-01 04:12 EST (History)
CC List:	2 users (show)

See Also:
Fixed In Version:
Doc Type:	Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points:	---
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed:	2009-03-01 04:12:44 EST
Type:	---
Regression:	---
Mount Type:	---
Documentation:	---
CRM:
Verified Versions:
Category:	---
oVirt Team:	---
RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team:	---

Attachments	(Terms of Use)
Add an attachment (proposed patch, testcase, etc.)

Groups: None (edit)

Description Stephen Warren 2008-06-30 18:59:59 EDT

I just performed an upgrade from Fedora 8 to Fedora 9 using preupgrade.

I had this version of grub installed:
grub-0.97-33.1.fc8.i386

yum did not upgrade this rpm to the Fedora 9 version, because the pushed F9
version is older than the F8 version:
grub-0.97-33.fc9.i386.rpm

It seems that the F8 version went from 33.fc8 to 33.1.fc8, which is newer than
F9's 33.fc9. F8's version should have been built as 33.fc8.1 instead.

To solve this, F9's grub should be rebuilt as 34.fc9 and pushed.

Comment 1 Stephen Warren 2008-07-11 13:48:13 EDT

Hmm. That said, this won't help fix preupgrade, or the upgrade-via-F9-release-cd
path, since they both use the initial F9 release RPMs that can't be changed.

Can grub in F9 be down-graded to and older name-version-release? I guess that's
not possible for people who've already 'yum update'd...

Shouldn't Koji/Bodhi enforce the NVR ordering between releases? For some reason,
I thought it did...

Comment 2 lexual 2009-03-01 04:12:44 EST


*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 469486 ***

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.