This service will be undergoing maintenance at 00:00 UTC, 2016-08-01. It is expected to last about 1 hours
Bug 453487 - langpacks need updating to current default CIJK fonts
langpacks need updating to current default CIJK fonts
Status: CLOSED RAWHIDE
Product: Fedora
Classification: Fedora
Component: openoffice.org (Show other bugs)
rawhide
All Linux
low Severity low
: ---
: ---
Assigned To: Caolan McNamara
Fedora Extras Quality Assurance
:
: 453868 453869 (view as bug list)
Depends On:
Blocks: F10Target
  Show dependency treegraph
 
Reported: 2008-06-30 19:35 EDT by Jens Petersen
Modified: 2008-07-07 08:44 EDT (History)
3 users (show)

See Also:
Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2008-07-07 08:44:38 EDT
Type: ---
Regression: ---
Mount Type: ---
Documentation: ---
CRM:
Verified Versions:
Category: ---
oVirt Team: ---
RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:


Attachments (Terms of Use)
openoffice.org.spec-fonts-update.patch (6.09 KB, patch)
2008-07-02 04:50 EDT, Jens Petersen
no flags Details | Diff

  None (edit)
Description Jens Petersen 2008-06-30 19:35:27 EDT
Description of problem:
In Fedora 8 we made some major repackaging changes to the fonts for ja, ko, zh
and Indic
and also ar and he.  The fonts-* packages were split up into individual packages
named after their upstream project.  Also in F9 we changed the default font for
Japanese to VLGothic-fonts.  In F10 we are removing most of the remaining
fonts-* meta
packages and also introducing a new default font for Korean (un-fonts-core is
currently
under package review).

So in this bug I would like to describe the required changes.  If you prefer
separate
fonts for the above we could also make this a tracking bug but I think that should
hopefully not be necessary.

More details to come as necessary (I guess the fonts in the @fonts comps group
are a pretty good indication of the default fonts though).
Comment 1 Caolan McNamara 2008-07-01 08:23:21 EDT
Can you just tell me what fonts packages you want for which langpacks and I can
do it immediately.
Comment 2 Jens Petersen 2008-07-02 04:50:54 EDT
Created attachment 310769 [details]
openoffice.org.spec-fonts-update.patch

Here is a patch which should provide the necessary changes.
Comment 3 Jens Petersen 2008-07-02 04:52:14 EDT
Though now that we install all those fonts by default anyway, I would rather
openoffice.org langpacks didn't really require any fonts explicitly.
Comment 4 Caolan McNamara 2008-07-02 07:47:38 EDT
Its a fine theory to not require any fonts at all, but history shows that a most
terrible amount of whining and general bitching about the stupidity of
OpenOffice.org occurs without a guarantee of at least one font installed which
can cover the desired range :-)
Comment 5 Jens Petersen 2008-07-02 21:25:16 EDT
*** Bug 453868 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 6 Caolan McNamara 2008-07-03 09:40:36 EDT
*** Bug 453869 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.