Bug 454903 - cpio failure on package update means package gets removed.
cpio failure on package update means package gets removed.
Status: CLOSED RAWHIDE
Product: Fedora
Classification: Fedora
Component: rpm (Show other bugs)
rawhide
All Linux
low Severity low
: ---
: ---
Assigned To: Panu Matilainen
Fedora Extras Quality Assurance
: FutureFeature
Depends On:
Blocks:
  Show dependency treegraph
 
Reported: 2008-07-10 13:10 EDT by Dave Jones
Modified: 2015-01-04 17:30 EST (History)
5 users (show)

See Also:
Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: Enhancement
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2009-03-07 03:39:47 EST
Type: ---
Regression: ---
Mount Type: ---
Documentation: ---
CRM:
Verified Versions:
Category: ---
oVirt Team: ---
RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: ---


Attachments (Terms of Use)

  None (edit)
Description Dave Jones 2008-07-10 13:10:28 EDT
during a yum update, I saw..

 Updating       : nfs-utils                                     [ 66/212] 
Error unpacking rpm package 1:nfs-utils-1.1.2-12.fc10.i386

and then later..
Stopping RPC idmapd: [  OK  ]
Starting RPC idmapd: [  OK  ]
Stopping NFS locking: [  OK  ]
Stopping NFS statd: [  OK  ]
Starting NFS statd: [  OK  ]
  Cleanup        : nfs-utils                                     [171/212] 

and the result is..

$ rpm -q nfs-utils
package nfs-utils is not installed


if the install stage breaks for whatever reason, we really shouldn't be running
the cleanup stage.  I'm just really thankful this happened to a bunch of
non-critical packages. if it was glibc, I'd be completely hosed.
Comment 1 Jeff Johnson 2008-07-17 08:33:24 EDT
The problem is harder to fix than what is implemented in rpm-4.4.2.3.4.5.6.7...

In general, package side effects, like Obsoletes: and/or upgrade,
are dependent on the success of the install. In your case, the
nfs-install package, which has a single dependent action, removing
the old nfs-utils package.

The general form of relations with the side effects of Obsoletes: and upgrades is many <-> many.
Consider what should happen if the nfs-utils package carried several Obsoletes: as
well as the implicit upgrade. Should the Obsoletes: be performed if the install fails?
I think not.

The many-to-many side effects dependent on the success (or failure) of
the initial install (in yr case nfs-utils) is correctly handled in the @rpm5.org
code base for several years now.

Have fun!
Comment 2 Panu Matilainen 2009-03-07 03:39:47 EST
Fixed in rawhide now.

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.