Spec URL: http://lucilanga.fedorapeople.org/soundmodem.spec SRPM URL: http://lucilanga.fedorapeople.org/soundmodem-0.10-1.fc9.src.rpm Description: This package contains the driver and the diagnostic utility for userspace SoundModem. It allows you to use soundcards supported by OSS/Free as Amateur Packet Radio modems.
Our drivers aren't OSS/Free (they're alsa), so that description could probably use some rewording. Maybe just 's|supported by OSS/Free||'
I've updated the description and bumped version new files: http://lucilanga.fedorapeople.org/soundmodem.spec http://lucilanga.fedorapeople.org/soundmodem-0.10-2.fc9.src.rpm
This failed to build for me on x86_64 with current rawhide: + ./configure --build=x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu --host=x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu --target=x86_64-redhat-linux-gnu --program-prefix= --prefix=/usr --exec-prefix=/usr --bindir=/usr/bin --sbindir=/usr/sbin --sysconfdir=/etc --datadir=/usr/share --includedir=/usr/include --libdir=/usr/lib64 --libexecdir=/usr/libexec --localstatedir=/var --sharedstatedir=/usr/com --mandir=/usr/share/man --infodir=/usr/share/info checking build system type... Invalid configuration `x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu': machine `x86_64-unknown' not recognized configure: error: /bin/sh ./config.sub x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu failed I do not know what that means. Maybe the configure script was simply generated by a really old autotools version?
(In reply to comment #3) > I do not know what that means. Maybe the configure script was simply generated > by a really old autotools version? I've used autotools to update. new ver: http://lucilanga.fedorapeople.org/soundmodem.spec http://lucilanga.fedorapeople.org/soundmodem-0.10-3.fc10.src.rpm
Builds fine and rpmlint is silent. The documentation files are duplicated between the main and -devel package. Unfortunately, modem.h and simd.h are far too generic to place in /usr/include. * source files match upstream. sha256sum: e7a42c413a180b873ae76b2c252904a3e34c9807c2604f2315426443d9e28627 soundmodem-0.10.tar.gz * package meets naming and versioning guidelines. * specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently. * summary is OK. * description is OK. * dist tag is present. * build root is OK. * license field matches the actual license. * license is open source-compatible. * license text included in package. * latest version is being packaged. * BuildRequires are proper. * compiler flags are appropriate. * %clean is present. * package builds in mock (rawhide, x86_64). * package installs properly. * debuginfo package looks complete. * rpmlint is silent. * final provides and requires are sane: soundmodem-0.10-3.fc11.x86_64.rpm soundmodem = 0.10-3.fc11 soundmodem(x86-64) = 0.10-3.fc11 = /bin/sh chkconfig initscripts libX11.so.6()(64bit) libXext.so.6()(64bit) libXi.so.6()(64bit) libasound.so.2()(64bit) libasound.so.2(ALSA_0.9)(64bit) libasound.so.2(ALSA_0.9.0rc4)(64bit) libaudiofile.so.0()(64bit) libgdk-1.2.so.0()(64bit) libglib-1.2.so.0()(64bit) libgmodule-1.2.so.0()(64bit) libgtk-1.2.so.0()(64bit) libutil.so.1()(64bit) libutil.so.1(GLIBC_2.2.5)(64bit) libxml.so.1()(64bit) soundmodem-devel-0.10-3.fc11.x86_64.rpm soundmodem-devel = 0.10-3.fc11 soundmodem-devel(x86-64) = 0.10-3.fc11 = soundmodem = 0.10-3.fc11 * no shared libraries are added to the regular linker search paths. * owns the directories it creates. * doesn't own any directories it shouldn't. * no duplicates in %files. * file permissions are appropriate. X generically named files * scriptlets present OK (service management). * code, not content. * documentation is small, so no -doc subpackage is necessary. * %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package. * headers are in the -devel package. * no pkgconfig files. * no static libraries. * no libtool .la files.
(In reply to comment #5) > The documentation files are duplicated between the main and -devel package. Updated, there's no doc files for devel package. > Unfortunately, modem.h and simd.h are far too generic to place in /usr/include. Moved'em to /usr/include/soundmodem. http://lucilanga.fedorapeople.org/soundmodem.spec http://lucilanga.fedorapeople.org/soundmodem-0.10-4.fc10.src.rpm
Created attachment 326008 [details] remove spurious printf's I've removed two spurious printfs that were resulting in the syslog buffers getting filled up when soundmodem runs as daemon. I've been running soundmodem in two production aprsdigi's for several years with this patch. Without it, soundmodem would randomly exit.
Created attachment 326009 [details] SPEC to apply spurious printf patch This is the SPEC to apply the spurious printf's patch.
Created attachment 326010 [details] applies soundmodem-spurious-printf.patch Sorry, I patched against what is in the fedora SRPM. Here's the update against the 10.4 spec.
The issues I had with this review have been fixed. It would be nice to address the above mentioned code quality issue, which I have no way to test, but I'm going to leave that up to Lucian. Alan, if your issue is not addressed when this package is imported, please consider filing a bug against it. Unfortunately you can't do that now because the review isn't finished and so the bugzilla component doesn't exist yet. It should be available soon after the CVS request has been processed. Anyway, I'm going to approve this and leave it to Lucian to decide what to do with the above patch. APPROVED
Thank you, Jason. Alan, thank you for the patch, I'm going to handle this after I check this in. New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: soundmodem Short Description: Soundcard Packet Radio Modem Owners: lucilanga Branches: F-9 F-10 EL-5 InitialCC:
cvs done.
soundmodem-0.10-5.fc9 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 9. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/soundmodem-0.10-5.fc9
soundmodem-0.10-5.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/soundmodem-0.10-5.fc10