Bug 456378 - RHEL5: audit log injection attack via login
RHEL5: audit log injection attack via login
Status: CLOSED ERRATA
Product: Red Hat Enterprise Linux 5
Classification: Red Hat
Component: util-linux (Show other bugs)
5.0
All Linux
low Severity low
: rc
: ---
Assigned To: Karel Zak
Ben Levenson
:
Depends On:
Blocks:
  Show dependency treegraph
 
Reported: 2008-07-23 04:39 EDT by Karel Zak
Modified: 2009-01-20 15:45 EST (History)
1 user (show)

See Also:
Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2009-01-20 15:45:35 EST
Type: ---
Regression: ---
Mount Type: ---
Documentation: ---
CRM:
Verified Versions:
Category: ---
oVirt Team: ---
RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: ---


Attachments (Terms of Use)

  None (edit)
Description Karel Zak 2008-07-23 04:39:46 EDT
Steve Grubb wrote:
> A while back I found a couple audit log injection attacks which became
> CVE-2007-3102. I forgot to look at login to see if its vulnerable and Mirek
> found that it is. To verify the problem, type:
> 
> root addr=xyz.com
>
> for the account name while logging in. It will look like root logged in with
> an address of xyz.com.

Note, the problem has been fixed in Fedora and upstream code.
Comment 1 RHEL Product and Program Management 2008-07-23 05:00:52 EDT
This request was evaluated by Red Hat Product Management for inclusion in a Red
Hat Enterprise Linux maintenance release.  Product Management has requested
further review of this request by Red Hat Engineering, for potential
inclusion in a Red Hat Enterprise Linux Update release for currently deployed
products.  This request is not yet committed for inclusion in an Update
release.
Comment 6 errata-xmlrpc 2009-01-20 15:45:35 EST
An advisory has been issued which should help the problem
described in this bug report. This report is therefore being
closed with a resolution of ERRATA. For more information
on therefore solution and/or where to find the updated files,
please follow the link below. You may reopen this bug report
if the solution does not work for you.

http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2009-0070.html

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.