Red Hat Bugzilla – Bug 456518
multicall fails with getbugssimple
Last modified: 2009-06-10 03:46:51 EDT
Description of problem: Maybe I'm doing something wrong, but I have tried to get info about more bugs similar as in /usr/bin/bugzilla code. I have this peace of code: import bugzilla bz = bugzilla.Bugzilla(url='https://bugzilla.redhat.com/xmlrpc.cgi') bz.login('jhutar@redhat.com', 'xyz') bug_ids = (123456, 789123, 456789) bug_list = bz.getbugssimple(bug_ids) for id, bug in zip(bug_ids, bug_list): print id print bug I'm getting only first bug, others are translated by replace_getbug_errors_with_None to None. Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): python-bugzilla-0.3-1.fc9.noarch How reproducible: always Steps to Reproduce: 1. run the script above Actual results: 123456 #123456 blablabla 789123 None 456789 None Expected results: 123456 #123456 blablabla 789123 #789123 blablabla 456789 #456789 blablabla Additional info: Filtered "None" messages are filtered because raw results contails this error message: Error: DBD::mysql::db do failed: The MySQL server is running with the --read- only option so it cannot execute this statement at Bugzilla/Auth/Cookie.pm line 318 Bugzilla::Auth::Cookie::_insert_new_session(203706) called at Bugzilla/ Auth/Cookie.pm line 202 Bugzilla::Auth::Cookie::set_cookie_login_info('Bugzilla::Auth::Cookie', 203706, 'undef', 'undef') called at Bugzilla/Auth/RPC.pm line 63 Bugzilla::Auth::RPC::login('Bugzilla::Auth::RPC', 0, 'jhutar@redhat.com', 'xyz') called at Bugzilla.pm line 99 Bugzilla::login('undef', 'undef', 'jhutar@redhat.com', 'xyz') called at Bugzilla/RPC/Bug.pm line 127 Bugzilla::RPC::Bug::getBugSimple(430155, 'jhutar@redhat.com', 'xyz') called at /var/www/html/bugzilla/xmlrpc.cgi line 104 eval {...} called at /var/www/html/bugzilla/xmlrpc.cgi line 102 system::multicall('system', 'ARRAY(0x1d38ab0)') called at /usr/lib/ perl5/vendor_perl/5.8.5/SOAP/Lite.pm line 2474 eval {...} called at /usr/lib/perl5/vendor_perl/5.8.5/SOAP/Lite.pm line 2462 eval {...} called at /usr/lib/perl5/vendor_perl/5.8.5/SOAP/Lite.pm line 2433 SOAP::Server::handle('Bugzilla::RPC=HASH(0x1b5cb60)', '<?xml version= \'1.0\'?>\x{a}<methodCall>\x{a}<methodName>system.multi...') called at /usr/lib/ perl5/vendor_perl/5.8.5/SOAP/Transport/HTTP.pm line 317 SOAP::Transport::HTTP::Server::handle('Bugzilla::RPC=HASH(0x1b5cb60)') called at /usr/lib/perl5/vendor_perl/5.8.5/SOAP/Transport/HTTP.pm line 408 SOAP::Transport::HTTP::CGI::handle('Bugzilla::RPC=HASH(0x1b5cb60)') called at /var/www/html/bugzilla/xmlrpc.cgi line 45 package => bugzilla, method => getBugSimple, full_method => bugzilla::getBugSimple, params => [430155,jhutar@redhat.com,xyz] Thank you in advance for any help.
I'm pretty sure this was a transient bug in the server xmlrpc code - have you tried this code snippet again recently? You could also try using python-bugzilla 0.4rc2 (available in rawhide, but works in F9/F8/etc.). If that's not possible, could you give me the exact bug IDs you're trying to fetch? bug #789123 obviously doesn't exist, so returning None there is sensible.
This message is a reminder that Fedora 9 is nearing its end of life. Approximately 30 (thirty) days from now Fedora will stop maintaining and issuing updates for Fedora 9. It is Fedora's policy to close all bug reports from releases that are no longer maintained. At that time this bug will be closed as WONTFIX if it remains open with a Fedora 'version' of '9'. Package Maintainer: If you wish for this bug to remain open because you plan to fix it in a currently maintained version, simply change the 'version' to a later Fedora version prior to Fedora 9's end of life. Bug Reporter: Thank you for reporting this issue and we are sorry that we may not be able to fix it before Fedora 9 is end of life. If you would still like to see this bug fixed and are able to reproduce it against a later version of Fedora please change the 'version' of this bug to the applicable version. If you are unable to change the version, please add a comment here and someone will do it for you. Although we aim to fix as many bugs as possible during every release's lifetime, sometimes those efforts are overtaken by events. Often a more recent Fedora release includes newer upstream software that fixes bugs or makes them obsolete. The process we are following is described here: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BugZappers/HouseKeeping
Yes, you are right. Sorry for not responding. It works now.