Bug 456941 - Review Request: thrift - Multi-language RPC and serialization framework
Review Request: thrift - Multi-language RPC and serialization framework
Status: CLOSED WONTFIX
Product: Fedora
Classification: Fedora
Component: Package Review (Show other bugs)
rawhide
All Linux
medium Severity medium
: ---
: ---
Assigned To: Nobody's working on this, feel free to take it
Fedora Extras Quality Assurance
:
Depends On:
Blocks:
  Show dependency treegraph
 
Reported: 2008-07-28 15:21 EDT by Devan Goodwin
Modified: 2008-12-15 16:48 EST (History)
3 users (show)

See Also:
Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2008-12-15 16:48:27 EST
Type: ---
Regression: ---
Mount Type: ---
Documentation: ---
CRM:
Verified Versions:
Category: ---
oVirt Team: ---
RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: ---


Attachments (Terms of Use)

  None (edit)
Description Devan Goodwin 2008-07-28 15:21:00 EDT
Spec URL: http://dgoodwin.fedorapeople.org/thrift/thrift.spec
SRPM URL: http://dgoodwin.fedorapeople.org/thrift/thrift-20080728-0.1.svn680338.fc9.src.rpm
Description: 

Thrift is a software framework for scalable cross-language services
development. It combines a powerful software stack with a code generation
engine to build services that work efficiently and seamlessly between C++,
Java, C#, Python, Ruby, Perl, PHP, Objective C/Cocoa, Smalltalk, Erlang,
Objective Caml, and Haskell.
Comment 1 Devan Goodwin 2008-07-28 15:22:53 EDT
(dev@kramer)[~/rpmbuild/SPECS] % rpmlint
~/rpmbuild/SRPMS/thrift-20080728-0.1.svn680338.fc9.src.rpm 

1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings.


(dev@kramer)[~/rpmbuild/SPECS] % rpmlint ~/rpmbuild/RPMS/x86_64/*thrift* 

libthrift-cpp-devel.x86_64: W: no-documentation

7 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings.


There is a README in the lib/cpp directory but I chose to include it with the
libthrift-cpp package instead of -devel. I considered including it with both but
saw the package guidelines state that duplicate files shouldn't be included,
assuming this applies to sub-packages as well.
Comment 2 Devan Goodwin 2008-07-28 15:29:24 EDT
Mistakenly submitted this from my work Bugzilla account, this is my Fedora
account/email, will it be possible to have this as the package owner?
Comment 3 Devan Goodwin 2008-12-15 16:48:27 EST
Withdrawing review request, no longer looking to use this library and thus probably shouldn't undertake Fedora maintenance of it.

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.