previously, the man pages and usage messages for rpcclient,
smbcacls, samba-client, smbget, smbtree, and pdbedit contained
errors, omissions, and outdated information. Users could not
therefore rely on the provided documentation to use these programs.
The documentation for each of these components has been reviewed and
corrected and no longer contains misleading information.
Description of problem:
1) manual page of rpcclient does not mention longer versions of following
command line options: -k (--kerberos), -I (--dest-ip), -s (--configfile),
-n (--netbiosname), -N (--no-pass), -i (--scope), -O (--socket-options)
2) --logfile is stated as a long version of -l option but --log-basename is
actually recognized by the binary
3)following options are not covered by the man page at all: -P --machine-pass,
-p --port, -S --signed
Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
samba-client-3.0.28-1.el5_2.2.i386
How reproducible:
always
Steps to Reproduce:
compare manpage to rpcclient --help
Additional info:
Used Milos Malik's option-comparator to do the options analysis. See
attachments for complete output.
Comment 11Ruediger Landmann
2010-03-22 15:29:35 UTC
Technical note added. If any revisions are required, please edit the "Technical Notes" field
accordingly. All revisions will be proofread by the Engineering Content Services team.
New Contents:
previously, the man pages and usage messages for rpcclient,
smbcacls, samba-client, smbget, smbtree, and pdbedit contained
errors, omissions, and outdated information. Users could not
therefore rely on the provided documentation to use these programs.
The documentation for each of these components has been reviewed and
corrected and no longer contains misleading information.
An advisory has been issued which should help the problem
described in this bug report. This report is therefore being
closed with a resolution of ERRATA. For more information
on therefore solution and/or where to find the updated files,
please follow the link below. You may reopen this bug report
if the solution does not work for you.
http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2010-0300.html