Bug 457672 - ON_DEV missing from status field definition on help page
Summary: ON_DEV missing from status field definition on help page
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED NEXTRELEASE
Alias: None
Product: Bugzilla
Classification: Community
Component: Documentation
Version: 3.2
Hardware: All
OS: Linux
medium
low
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: Noura El hawary
QA Contact:
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On:
Blocks:
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2008-08-03 09:40 UTC by Sterling Winter
Modified: 2008-08-04 17:33 UTC (History)
1 user (show)

Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2008-08-04 16:27:28 UTC
Embargoed:


Attachments (Terms of Use)
patch to remove REPOENED status and add ON_DEV to status docs (1.90 KB, patch)
2008-08-03 10:40 UTC, Noura El hawary
dkl: review+
Details | Diff

Description Sterling Winter 2008-08-03 09:40:28 UTC
On the help page there should be an entry describing the ON_DEV status:

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/page.cgi?id=fields.html#status

Also, the REOPENED entry there may be superfluous since that particular status doesn't appear in the status selector box on the advanced bug search page.

Comment 1 Noura El hawary 2008-08-03 10:38:44 UTC
Thanks for reporting this issue, yeah true the ON_DEV is missing in the docs, and the REOPENED status is not there anymore basically CLOSED bug can now be changed directly to ASSIGNED with adding the keywork "Reopened" to the bug.

Will submit a fix for that with the next package update.

Noura

Comment 2 Noura El hawary 2008-08-03 10:40:20 UTC
Created attachment 313288 [details]
patch to remove REPOENED status and add ON_DEV to status docs

Hi Dave ,, 

this is a patch to fix the status documentation. Please let me know what you think.

Thanks,
Noura

Comment 3 David Lawrence 2008-08-04 03:28:32 UTC
Comment on attachment 313288 [details]
patch to remove REPOENED status and add ON_DEV to status docs

Looks good to me.

Comment 4 Noura El hawary 2008-08-04 16:27:28 UTC
Thanks for the review Dave, committed to cvs

Comment 5 Sterling Winter 2008-08-04 17:33:32 UTC
"This bug is undergoing integration testing in dev."

It would be helpful to (non-developer) end users to explain exactly what "in dev" means -- that's merely a circular definition of ON_DEV. Also, on a help page you should avoid using abbreviations such as "dev" as they can be ambiguous.


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.