Bug 458311
| Summary: | RFE: email notification for *new* updates only. | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | Red Hat Enterprise Linux 5 | Reporter: | Aleksey Nogin <aleksey> |
| Component: | yum-updatesd | Assignee: | James Antill <james.antill> |
| Status: | CLOSED WONTFIX | QA Contact: | Red Hat Satellite QA List <satqe-list> |
| Severity: | low | Docs Contact: | |
| Priority: | medium | ||
| Version: | 5.5 | CC: | bgollahe, james.antill, syeghiay |
| Target Milestone: | --- | Keywords: | FutureFeature, Reopened |
| Target Release: | --- | ||
| Hardware: | All | ||
| OS: | Linux | ||
| Whiteboard: | |||
| Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | Enhancement | |
| Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
| Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
| Last Closed: | 2012-10-30 14:34:41 UTC | Type: | --- |
| Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
| Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
| Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
| oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
| Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
| Embargoed: | |||
|
Description
Aleksey Nogin
2008-08-07 15:38:26 UTC
Currently yum-updatesd doesn't store anything itself, this kind of feature would require that we store the "current updates" and diff it on the next run. This is unlikely to happen, esp. if it doesn't happen upstream first. I'll move this to rawhide ... but I wouldn't expect a quick resolution. This is working exactly as its intended too. Keeping some sort of state would basically entail leaving the rpmdb/yum state locked or serializing it in some way, which really isn't that interesting. Well, even if it's working as "intended", and improving it is not "interesting", this results in quite unpleasant end-user experience, including for paying RHEL users like me. I get yum-updatesd notifications from several different machines (they have different sets of packages installed, different channel subscription, etc, so I need separate notifications) and being "mailbomed" by all of them every time a common update is posted to RHN is quite annoying. Please reconsider the "WONTFIX". P.S. IMHO, keeping state in a small text file in /var/cache/yum would not be a big deal. This BZ wasn't attached to any support request, which is why I moved it to Fedora. If you raise the request through the support channels you might get a different answer than the current one, even if _eventually_ it'll get back to me with a different BZ. OK, filed Service Request 1849028 on this. Still a big annoyance in RHEL 5.5 (especially when email notifications are enabled on several machines). Any chance this could be revisited? Thank you for submitting this issue for consideration. Red Hat Enterprise Linux 5 has reached the end of Production 1 Phase of its Life Cycle. Red Hat does not plan to incorporate the suggested capability in a future Red Hat Enterprise Linux 5 minor release. If you would like Red Hat to re-consider this feature request and the requested functionality is not currently in Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6, please re-open the request via appropriate support channels and provide additional supporting details about the importance of this issue. |