This is my first package and I am seeking for a sponsor

Well, as koji (Fedora build server) is currently down I cannot do a full
review, however:

this package seems almost good except that:
* For SourceURL, consider to use %{name}, %{version} (especially %{version}).
  With this you probably don't have to modify SourceURL when version is upgraded.

And as this is NEEDSPONSOR blocker, there is some notes.
-------------------------------------------------------------
NOTE: Before being sponsored:

This package will be accepted with another few work. 
But before I accept this package, someone (I am a candidate) 
must sponsor you.

Once you are sponsored, you have the right to review other 
submitters' review requests and approve the packages formally. 
For this reason, the person who want to be sponsored (like you) 
are required to "show that you have an understanding 
of the process and of the packaging guidelines" as is described
on :
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/HowToGetSponsored

Usually there are two ways to show this.
A. submit other review requests with enough quality.
B. Do a "pre-review" of other person's review request
   (at the time you are not sponsored, you cannot do
   a formal review)

When you have submitted a new review request or have pre-reviewed other 
person's review request, please write the bug number on this bug report 
so that I can check your comments or review request.

Fedora package collection review requests which are waiting for someone to
review can be checked on:
http://fedoraproject.org/PackageReviewStatus/NEW.html
(NOTE: please don't choose "Merge Review")


Review guidelines are described mainly on:
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/ReviewGuidelines
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/ScriptletSnippets
------------------------------------------------------------

One more notes:
* As this package contains tests/ subdirectory, please consider add %check section and
  execute some test program in the section.

I have updated the SOURCEURL and added the %check section with corresponding entries to %changelog

SPEC URL: http://rishi.fedorapeople.org/teseq.spec
SRPM URL: http://rishi.fedorapeople.org/teseq-1.0.0-2.fc8.src.rpm

I have also submitted another review request whose URL is 

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459871

When I put up more review requests should I check the FE:NEEDSPONSOR BLOCK and put in I am looking for a sponsor or should I just add them in the Comment field for this package to bring them to your notice ?

To help this review:

Yes, add FE-NEEDSPONSOR to 'Blocks' field(necessary) & leave a comment are both okay

You may like to keep old changelog entries.
%changelog
* Thu Aug 21 2008 Vivek Shah <boni.vivek at gmail.com> 2.12-1
- Initial Package

I did a successful build:
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=782273

For 1.0.0-2

* %changelog
  - As Rakesh says, please keep previous changelog entries.

- Other things are okay for this package.
- Your another review request (bug 459871) seems good to some
  extent.

---------------------------------------------------------------------
      This package (teseq) is APPROVED by mtasaka
---------------------------------------------------------------------

Please follow the procedure written on:
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/Join
from "Get a Fedora Account".
At a point a mail should be sent to sponsor members which notifies
that you need a sponsor. At the stage, please also write on
this bug for confirmation that you requested for sponsorship and
your FAS (Fedora Account System) name. Then I will sponsor you.

If you want to import this package into Fedora 8/9, you also have
to look at
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Infrastructure/UpdatesSystem/Bodhi-info-DRAFT
(after once you rebuilt this package on koji Fedora rebuilding system).

If you have questions, please ask me.

Thanks for the reviews and the advices.
I have sent a request to be included in the Fedora Packager CVS commit group.

my FAS name is bonii

Thanks for the pointers and all the help

Now I am sponsoring you. Please follow "Join" wiki again.

Thanks I am going through the detailed procedures on the links mentioned above.

Meanwhile I have updated (bug 459871) and also created 2 more review requests
(bug 459989) and (bug 459983)

New Package CVS Request
=======================
Package Name: teseq
Short Description: An utility for rendering terminal typescripts human readable
Owners: bonii
Branches: F-8 F-9 
InitialCC: mtasaka

Well, I don't need myself to be added as InitialCC member.

Since this is my first package which I will be adding to cvs I felt adding you to the InitialCC list was required so that you could track the progress of the package. If that is not required do tell me and I will update it

Well, adding the reviewer (or sponsor) to InitialCC member is not required. 

Anyway you can feel free to ask me on this bug (for this review request)
or by mailing to me if you have some questions.

New Package CVS Request
=======================
Package Name: teseq
Short Description: An utility for rendering terminal typescripts human readable
Owners: bonii
Branches: F-8 F-9 
InitialCC:

cvs done.

teseq-1.0.0-2.fc9 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 9.
http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/teseq-1.0.0-2.fc9

teseq-1.0.0-2.fc8 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 8.
http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/teseq-1.0.0-2.fc8

Okay, now closing.

teseq-1.0.0-2.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 stable repository.  If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.

teseq-1.0.0-2.fc8 has been pushed to the Fedora 8 stable repository.  If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.