Red Hat Bugzilla – Bug 458804
should discard errors from dircolors
Last modified: 2008-08-12 11:00:06 EDT
+++ This bug was initially created as a clone of Bug #430823 +++
/etc/profile.d/colorls.sh tries to run eval `dircolors --sh "$COLORS"`. This
can generate errors if the configuration file (e.g. ~/.dircolors) is designed
for a newer version of ls.
For instance, dircolors recently introduced SETUID, SETGID,
STICKY_OTHER_WRITABLE, OTHER_WRITABLE, and STICKY options. I want to set a
color for them in my ~/.dircolors, but I also want to share my ~/.dircolors on
older Red Hat and Fedora systems.
If I do so, I get these errors when logging in to a RHEL 4system
dircolors: `/home/mward/.dircolors':37: unrecognized keyword STICKY_OTHER_WRITABLE
dircolors: `/home/mward/.dircolors':38: unrecognized keyword OTHER_WRITABLE
dircolors: `/home/mward/.dircolors':39: unrecognized keyword STICKY
I doubt you're going to fix this in RHEL 4, but at least going forwards, please
add 2>/dev/null to that line in colorls.sh to avoid such warnings.
(I also notice that you're sourcing ~/.dir_colors after ~/.dircolors.$TERM,
which seems wrong.)
--- Additional comment from firstname.lastname@example.org on 2008-01-29 18:15:52 EDT ---
See the URL for the brief discussion on the coreutils mailing list.
--- Additional comment from email@example.com on 2008-01-30 06:24:30 EDT ---
Thanks for report... I'm on that mailing list so I already read this item there
;). I think is more probable to have it fixed in RHEL4 than in FC-5 - as FC-5 is
EOL. So I will change the product to RHEL-4 and it will get fixed in next
maintainance release of RHEL-4 coreutils (as I agree that the error output
should be redirected to dev/null).
Anyway - colorls.sh and colorls.csh have to be rewritten, because they use
DIR_COLORS.xterm even on the gnome-terminal with dark background and because of
256 color support, so I will fix your objections there too.
--- Additional comment from firstname.lastname@example.org on 2008-01-31 11:59:53 EDT ---
Fixed and built as coreutils-6.10-4.fc9 in RAWHIDE branch of Fedora.
Same as RHEL-4, I guess it could cause troubles when using future RHEL-6 dircolors on RHEL-5, therefore it would be better to fix it.
This request was evaluated by Red Hat Product Management for inclusion in a Red
Hat Enterprise Linux maintenance release. Product Management has requested
further review of this request by Red Hat Engineering, for potential
inclusion in a Red Hat Enterprise Linux Update release for currently deployed
products. This request is not yet committed for inclusion in an Update
Closing DUPLICATE of #450508, this one was already cloned and ACKed for 5.3 in the first run-through RHEL-4 bugs ... missed that fact in the second run-through today... I guess I need glasses...
*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 450508 ***