Note: This bug is displayed in read-only format because the product is no longer active in Red Hat Bugzilla.

For bugs related to Red Hat Enterprise Linux 5 product line. The current stable release is 5.10. For Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6 and above, please visit Red Hat JIRA https://issues.redhat.com/secure/CreateIssue!default.jspa?pid=12332745 to report new issues.

Bug 458828

Summary:	please add an obsolete for tetex-lineno
Product:	Red Hat Enterprise Linux 5	Reporter:	Patrice Dumas <pertusus>
Component:	tetex	Assignee:	Jindrich Novy <jnovy>
Status:	CLOSED ERRATA	QA Contact:
Severity:	medium	Docs Contact:
Priority:	low
Version:	5.3	CC:	mkoci, pknirsch, rvokal
Target Milestone:	rc
Target Release:	---
Hardware:	All
OS:	Linux
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version:		Doc Type:	Bug Fix
Doc Text:		Story Points:	---
Clone Of:		Environment:
Last Closed:	2009-06-22 18:11:58 UTC	Type:	---
Regression:	---	Mount Type:	---
Documentation:	---	CRM:
Verified Versions:		Category:	---
oVirt Team:	---	RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team:	---	Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:

Description Patrice Dumas 2008-08-12 15:19:34 UTC

Description of problem:

As explained in Bug 426929 it would be nice to have, in tetex-texmf:

Obsoletes:      tetex-lineno = 4.41
Provides:       tetex-lineno = 4.42

I don't think that this change should require a rebuild, but if there
is a rebuild, I think it would be nice to have it.

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):


How reproducible:


Steps to Reproduce:
1.
2.
3.
  
Actual results:


Expected results:


Additional info:

Comment 2 Jindrich Novy 2009-05-07 13:56:21 UTC

The new teTeX should correctly obsolete tetex-lineno now.

Comment 6 errata-xmlrpc 2009-06-22 18:11:58 UTC

An advisory has been issued which should help the problem
described in this bug report. This report is therefore being
closed with a resolution of ERRATA. For more information
on therefore solution and/or where to find the updated files,
please follow the link below. You may reopen this bug report
if the solution does not work for you.

http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2009-1118.html