Spec URL: http://salimma.fedorapeople.org/for_review/gnustep/oolite-data.spec SRPM URL: http://salimma.fedorapeople.org/for_review/gnustep/oolite-data-1.65-2.fc10.src.rpm Description: Data files for Oolite
Nothing much to review here, as it's just a bunch of data... GOOD: ==== SHA1sum corresponds with upstream c322fa81a57d39e150806917cb052bb370efa725 oolite-1.65-data.tar.gz license is OK ( GPLv2+ ) builds fine in mock Potential problems ================== rpmlint output: Source RPM: oolite-data.src:32: E: hardcoded-library-path in %{_prefix}/lib/GNUstep/Applications/oolite.app/Contents oolite-data.src:33: E: hardcoded-library-path in %{_prefix}/lib/GNUstep/Applications/oolite.app/Contents/ oolite-data.src:43: E: hardcoded-library-path in %{_prefix}/lib/GNUstep/Applications/oolite.app/Contents/Resources/* --> What is the are these required by the game or oolite-data.src: W: mixed-use-of-spaces-and-tabs (spaces: line 3, tab: line 12) 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 3 errors, 1 warnings. --> esthetic bug, please fix before commit rpmlint of oolite-data: oolite-data.noarch: E: only-non-binary-in-usr-lib --> normal, as we have just data MUSTFIX ======= the folders below /usr/lib/GNUstep/Applications/oolite.app/ seem to be left unowned and at the first glance oolite does not own them either.
Closing this bug, as upstream has merged oolite and oolite-data