Note: This bug is displayed in read-only format because the product is no longer active in Red Hat Bugzilla.
For bugs related to Red Hat Enterprise Linux 5 product line. The current stable release is 5.10. For Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6 and above, please visit Red Hat JIRA https://issues.redhat.com/secure/CreateIssue!default.jspa?pid=12332745 to report new issues.

Bug 459845

Summary: Sos does not collect krb5.conf
Product: Red Hat Enterprise Linux 5 Reporter: Robert Jackson <rjackson>
Component: sosAssignee: Adam Stokes <astokes>
Status: CLOSED ERRATA QA Contact:
Severity: medium Docs Contact:
Priority: urgent    
Version: 5.2CC: agk, azelinka, bmr, dmair, mdavis, vanhoof
Target Milestone: rcKeywords: ZStream
Target Release: ---   
Hardware: All   
OS: Linux   
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2009-01-20 21:41:53 UTC Type: ---
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:
Bug Depends On:    
Bug Blocks: 459846, 467077    
Attachments:
Description Flags
adds collection of /etc/krb5.conf none

Description Robert Jackson 2008-08-22 20:58:12 UTC 
Description of problem: Sos does not collect krb5.conf


Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):


How reproducible: always


Steps to Reproduce:
1.sosreport -o samba
2.
3.
  
Actual results: Sos does not collect krb5.conf


Expected results: Sos should grab krb5.conf


Additional info:
Comment 1 Robert Jackson 2008-08-22 21:03:37 UTC 
Created attachment 314839 [details]
adds collection of /etc/krb5.conf
Comment 9 errata-xmlrpc 2009-01-20 21:41:53 UTC 
An advisory has been issued which should help the problem
described in this bug report. This report is therefore being
closed with a resolution of ERRATA. For more information
on therefore solution and/or where to find the updated files,
please follow the link below. You may reopen this bug report
if the solution does not work for you.

http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2009-0171.html