Bug 460361 - libopensync-plugin-synce.noarch should be arched
Summary: libopensync-plugin-synce.noarch should be arched
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED RAWHIDE
Alias: None
Product: Fedora
Classification: Fedora
Component: libopensync-plugin-synce
Version: rawhide
Hardware: x86_64
OS: Linux
medium
high
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: Andreas Bierfert
QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On:
Blocks:
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2008-08-27 19:20 UTC by Hasan Ceylan
Modified: 2009-03-27 19:42 UTC (History)
0 users

Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2009-03-27 19:42:42 UTC
Type: ---
Embargoed:


Attachments (Terms of Use)

Description Hasan Ceylan 2008-08-27 19:20:30 UTC
This plugin installs files under /usr/lib/opensync-1.0/python-plugins.

Where as opensync is arched and on x86_64 platforms look for those files under /usr/lib64/opensync-1.0/python-plugins folder

Therefore the plugin is not found.

Meanwhile the wiki at http://www.synce.org/moin/SynceSetup/OpenSync suggests an older version of the plugin which makes things more confusing.

Thus I think this rpm should be arched.

Regards,
Hasan Ceylan

Comment 1 Hasan Ceylan 2008-08-27 21:18:11 UTC
I wanted to check back the information I got...

The setup did not completely worked. The phone numbers did not get synchronized.

I had a chat session on the #synce IRC channel and apparently that is a known issue. Shuffling different version of the rpms did not help either.

I was instructed to use 0.22 release of libopensync on the IRC as 0.3X series were never considered as stable and inherently had a lot of bugs. Yet I think, Fedora had to go with the upgrade to unstable versions as the evolution-data-server dependency (I only guess).

Now, lastly I found out that the opensync is about to make a release by September the 1st. 

I think rawhide should upgrade to that version when it is out.

On the other hand, I was told by synce developers that "the current synce version should be compatible with a little modification if not as is"...

If all that information is already known, sorry for bugging, if not hope that it helps,

Regards,

Ceylan

Comment 2 Bug Zapper 2008-11-26 02:52:47 UTC
This bug appears to have been reported against 'rawhide' during the Fedora 10 development cycle.
Changing version to '10'.

More information and reason for this action is here:
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BugZappers/HouseKeeping


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.