Bug 461758 - Split perl files out to separate pilot-link-perl sub package
Summary: Split perl files out to separate pilot-link-perl sub package
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED RAWHIDE
Alias: None
Product: Fedora
Classification: Fedora
Component: pilot-link
Version: rawhide
Hardware: All
OS: Linux
medium
medium
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: Alex Lancaster
QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On:
Blocks: FedoraMini, Mobility
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2008-09-10 12:59 UTC by Peter Robinson
Modified: 2008-09-23 11:32 UTC (History)
2 users (show)

Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2008-09-22 10:26:34 UTC


Attachments (Terms of Use)
patch to the pilot-link spec file to split perl files out into a perl subpackage (3.86 KB, patch)
2008-09-15 12:34 UTC, Peter Robinson
no flags Details | Diff

Description Peter Robinson 2008-09-10 12:59:24 UTC
I notice that pilot-link can be built without the perl requirement. Would it be possible to split the perl files out into a separate pilot-link-perl sub package so that both a perl and non perl install is possible from the one build. This would allow reduction of dependence on perl without a reduction in functionality.

Comment 1 Peter Robinson 2008-09-15 12:34:16 UTC
Created attachment 316738 [details]
patch to the pilot-link spec file to split perl files out into a perl subpackage

The attached patch to the .spec file splits the perl utils out into a separate sub package.

Comment 2 Alex Lancaster 2008-09-15 15:43:58 UTC
Thanks for the patch.  I'll take a look at it when I get a chance in a week or so, unless Ivana gets to it first.

Comment 3 Ivana Varekova 2008-09-22 10:26:34 UTC
Thanks, Peter and Alex - I just separate the perl subpart in pilot-link-0.12.3-17.fc10 - if there is any problem, please write here a comment.

Comment 4 Alex Lancaster 2008-09-22 10:37:12 UTC
(In reply to comment #3)
> Thanks, Peter and Alex - I just separate the perl subpart in
> pilot-link-0.12.3-17.fc10 - if there is any problem, please write here a
> comment.

Thanks, can you sync the change back to F-9 at least, as well?  I think it would be useful to have this in F-9 (probably not F-8 though).  If you don't have time, I can do it.

Comment 5 Ivana Varekova 2008-09-23 11:32:04 UTC
Hello, from my point of view this change is not suitable for adding to fc-9 so I don't like to adding it there I think for now it is sufficient to fix it in rawhide branch only.


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.