Bug 462152 - Missing deps on redhat-ds-base-devel RPM?
Missing deps on redhat-ds-base-devel RPM?
Product: Red Hat Directory Server
Classification: Red Hat
Component: Install/Uninstall (Show other bugs)
All Linux
medium Severity medium
: ---
: ---
Assigned To: Nathan Kinder
Chandrasekar Kannan
Depends On:
Blocks: 249650 FDS1.2.0
  Show dependency treegraph
Reported: 2008-09-12 21:26 EDT by Steve Bonneville
Modified: 2015-01-04 18:34 EST (History)
2 users (show)

See Also:
Fixed In Version: 8.1
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of:
Last Closed: 2009-04-29 19:06:25 EDT
Type: ---
Regression: ---
Mount Type: ---
Documentation: ---
Verified Versions:
Category: ---
oVirt Team: ---
RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: ---

Attachments (Terms of Use)

  None (edit)
Description Steve Bonneville 2008-09-12 21:26:14 EDT
Description of problem:

In Red Hat Directory Server 8.0, the redhat-ds-base-devel RPM appears to be missing dependencies on mozldap-devel (for ldap.h) and nspr-devel (for prtypes.h) for two include files referenced by slapi-plugin.h.  If these two additional packages are not installed, builds of new plugins using slapi-plugin.h will fail.


Comment 1 Nathan Kinder 2009-01-30 12:56:14 EST
Added a dependency on mozldap6-devel (RHEL4) and mozldap-devel (RHEL5) to the redhat-ds-base-devel package.

Checking in DSRV-8_1-RHEL4/redhat-ds-base.spec;
/cvs/dist/rpms/redhat-ds-base/DSRV-8_1-RHEL4/redhat-ds-base.spec,v  <--  redhat-ds-base.spec
new revision: 1.26; previous revision: 1.25
Checking in DSRV-8_1-RHEL5/redhat-ds-base.spec;
/cvs/dist/rpms/redhat-ds-base/DSRV-8_1-RHEL5/redhat-ds-base.spec,v  <--  redhat-ds-base.spec
new revision: 1.29; previous revision: 1.28
Comment 2 Jenny Galipeau 2009-03-20 15:59:01 EDT
fix verified - DS 8.1 RHEL 4 and RHEL 5
Comment 3 Chandrasekar Kannan 2009-04-29 19:06:25 EDT
An advisory has been issued which should help the problem
described in this bug report. This report is therefore being
closed with a resolution of ERRATA. For more information
on therefore solution and/or where to find the updated files,
please follow the link below. You may reopen this bug report
if the solution does not work for you.


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.