Bug 462296 - Review Request: testgen4web-runner - Perl module to replay files recorded with TestGen4Web
Review Request: testgen4web-runner - Perl module to replay files recorded wit...
Product: Fedora
Classification: Fedora
Component: Package Review (Show other bugs)
All Linux
medium Severity medium
: ---
: ---
Assigned To: Marcela Mašláňová
Fedora Extras Quality Assurance
Depends On:
Blocks: FE-DEADREVIEW 462297
  Show dependency treegraph
Reported: 2008-09-15 03:44 EDT by Niall Sheridan
Modified: 2009-10-02 04:39 EDT (History)
3 users (show)

See Also:
Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of:
Last Closed: 2009-10-02 04:38:15 EDT
Type: ---
Regression: ---
Mount Type: ---
Documentation: ---
Verified Versions:
Category: ---
oVirt Team: ---
RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: ---
mmaslano: fedora‑review+

Attachments (Terms of Use)

  None (edit)
Description Niall Sheridan 2008-09-15 03:44:40 EDT
Spec URL: http://www.evil.ie/fedora/rpms/testgen4web-runner/perl-TestGen4Web-Runner.spec
SRPM URL: http://www.evil.ie/fedora/rpms/testgen4web-runner/perl-TestGen4Web-Runner-0.08-1.fc9.src.rpm
Description: TestGen4Web::Runner is a perl module to replay files recorded with
SpikeSource's TestGen4Web Recorder.
Comment 1 Marcela Mašláňová 2008-11-05 10:19:14 EST
OK source files match upstream: 
OK package meets naming and versioning guidelines.
OK specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently.
OK dist tag is present.
OK build root is correct.
OK license field (same as Perl) matches the actual license.
OK license is open source-compatible. License text not included upstream.
OK latest version is being packaged.
OK BuildRequires are proper.
OK %clean is present.
OK package builds in mock (Rawhide/x86_64).
OK debuginfo package isn't need.
OK rpmlint is silent.
OK final provides and requires look sane.
OK no shared libraries are added to the regular linker search paths.
OK owns the directories it creates.
OK no duplicates in %files.
OK file permissions are appropriate.
OK no scriptlets present.
OK code, not content.
OK documentation is small, so no -docs subpackage is necessary.
OK %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package.
OK no headers.
OK no pkgconfig files.
OK no libtool .la droppings.
Comment 2 Marcela Mašláňová 2009-08-21 06:58:22 EDT
Ping, cvs request? Or is it something blocking this package?
Comment 3 Peter Lemenkov 2009-10-02 04:38:15 EDT
Dead review.

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.