RHEL Engineering is moving the tracking of its product development work on RHEL 6 through RHEL 9 to Red Hat Jira (issues.redhat.com). If you're a Red Hat customer, please continue to file support cases via the Red Hat customer portal. If you're not, please head to the "RHEL project" in Red Hat Jira and file new tickets here. Individual Bugzilla bugs in the statuses "NEW", "ASSIGNED", and "POST" are being migrated throughout September 2023. Bugs of Red Hat partners with an assigned Engineering Partner Manager (EPM) are migrated in late September as per pre-agreed dates. Bugs against components "kernel", "kernel-rt", and "kpatch" are only migrated if still in "NEW" or "ASSIGNED". If you cannot log in to RH Jira, please consult article #7032570. That failing, please send an e-mail to the RH Jira admins at rh-issues@redhat.com to troubleshoot your issue as a user management inquiry. The email creates a ServiceNow ticket with Red Hat. Individual Bugzilla bugs that are migrated will be moved to status "CLOSED", resolution "MIGRATED", and set with "MigratedToJIRA" in "Keywords". The link to the successor Jira issue will be found under "Links", have a little "two-footprint" icon next to it, and direct you to the "RHEL project" in Red Hat Jira (issue links are of type "https://issues.redhat.com/browse/RHEL-XXXX", where "X" is a digit). This same link will be available in a blue banner at the top of the page informing you that that bug has been migrated.
Bug 463695 - [LTC 6.0 FEAT] 201723:Kernel Message Catalog autogeneration - Stage 1: infrastructure
Summary: [LTC 6.0 FEAT] 201723:Kernel Message Catalog autogeneration - Stage 1: infra...
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED WONTFIX
Alias: None
Product: Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6
Classification: Red Hat
Component: kernel
Version: 6.0
Hardware: s390x
OS: All
high
high
Target Milestone: alpha
: ---
Assignee: Jan Glauber
QA Contact: Martin Jenner
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On:
Blocks: 356741 463698 463700 465490
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2008-09-24 06:40 UTC by IBM Bug Proxy
Modified: 2009-06-20 06:25 UTC (History)
4 users (show)

Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2009-05-20 15:46:06 UTC
Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:


Attachments (Terms of Use)
rhel6-kmsg-catalog.diff (277.60 KB, text/plain)
2009-04-20 12:40 UTC, IBM Bug Proxy
no flags Details

Description IBM Bug Proxy 2008-09-24 06:40:27 UTC
=Comment: #0=================================================
Emily J. Ratliff <emilyr.com> - 2008-09-16 18:22 EDT
1. Feature Overview:
Feature Id:	[201723]
a. Name of Feature:	Kernel Message Catalog  autogeneration - Stage 1: infrastructure
b. Feature Description
Instrument the kernel components such that a kernel message catalog as well as related man pages can
be automatically generated.

2. Feature Details:
Sponsor:	zSeries
Architectures:
s390x

Arch Specificity: Purely Arch Specific Code
Affects Installer: Yes
Affects Core Kernel: Yes
Affects Kernel Modules: Yes
Delivery Mechanism: Direct from community
Category:	Kernel
Request Type:	Kernel - Enhancement from IBM
d. Upstream Acceptance:	Submitted
Sponsor Priority	1
f. Severity: High
IBM Confidential:	no
Code Contribution:	IBM code
g. Component Version Target:	k2.6.28

3. Business Case
This is a customer request, which will make it easier to do translation of the  messages and make
them more understandable to the administrator so that the can  react faster to a message.

4. Primary contact at Red Hat: 
John Jarvis
jjarvis

5. Primary contacts at Partner:
Project Management Contact:
Hans-Georg Markgraf, mgrf.com, Boeblingen 49-7031-16-3978

Technical contact(s):
Gonzalo Muelas Serrano, gmuelas.com

IBM Manager:
Thomas Schwarz, t.schwarz.com

Comment 2 Bill Nottingham 2008-10-02 21:16:36 UTC
We are not realistically equipped to do continuously updating translations for the kernel message catalogs out-of-band, so this would need to be in the upstream kernel to be accepted.

Comment 3 IBM Bug Proxy 2009-02-18 15:10:41 UTC
Actually the customer requirement was about having the kernel messages documented in a way (for exmaple man page), so that if the customer is interested, he can make the translation himself....we are not requesting Red Hat to translate the automatic generated kernel messages man pages.

The messages are accepted upstream, but the macros to automatically generate the man pages were rejected. If you are interested in the patch, we will be willing to provide it to you.

More details under:
??? In ???Kernel Messages??? in latest version of Device Drivers, Features, and Commands at:
http://www.ibm.com/developerworks/linux/linux390/development_documentation.html

Thank you!

Comment 5 IBM Bug Proxy 2009-04-20 12:40:53 UTC
Created attachment 340333 [details]
rhel6-kmsg-catalog.diff


------- Comment on attachment From hans.ibm.com 2009-04-20 08:39 EDT-------


added patch

Comment 6 John Jarvis 2009-05-20 14:42:24 UTC
IBM, can you please provide a pointer to the upstream rejection?

Comment 7 IBM Bug Proxy 2009-05-20 15:20:53 UTC
------- Comment From gmuelas.com 2009-05-20 11:13 EDT-------
Hello Red Hat,

here is the first in thread I found by google-ing "lkml kernel message catalog":
http://lkml.org/lkml/2008/10/16/200

Comment 8 Bill Nottingham 2009-05-20 15:30:45 UTC
That's the same one I found as well. If it's rejected upstream as a concept, we're not going to carry this as a patch.

Comment 9 RHEL Program Management 2009-05-20 15:46:06 UTC
Development Management has reviewed and declined this request.  You may appeal
this decision by reopening this request.

Comment 10 IBM Bug Proxy 2009-05-28 12:30:55 UTC
------- Comment From mgrf.com 2009-05-28 08:26 EDT-------
Hello Red Hat,
Thanks for your evaluation

Closing this feature request , Thx


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.