Bug 464645 - [RFE] Allow virtual jobs to assign virtual cpus.
Summary: [RFE] Allow virtual jobs to assign virtual cpus.
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED ERRATA
Alias: None
Product: Red Hat Enterprise MRG
Classification: Red Hat
Component: grid
Version: beta
Hardware: All
OS: Linux
medium
medium
Target Milestone: 1.1.1
: ---
Assignee: Benjamin Kreuter
QA Contact: Martin Kudlej
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On:
Blocks:
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2008-09-29 19:43 UTC by Charlie Wyse
Modified: 2018-10-20 03:00 UTC (History)
5 users (show)

Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2009-04-21 16:18:31 UTC
Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:


Attachments (Terms of Use)


Links
System ID Private Priority Status Summary Last Updated
Red Hat Product Errata RHEA-2009:0434 0 normal SHIPPED_LIVE Red Hat Enterprise MRG Messaging and Grid Version 1.1.1 2009-04-21 16:15:50 UTC

Description Charlie Wyse 2008-09-29 19:43:40 UTC
Description of problem:  Currently you can not set the amount of virtual cpus in a virtual job.


Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):


How reproducible:
Very

Steps to Reproduce:
1. Create a virtual job.
2. Run Job.
3. Notice virtual machine has 1 vcpu.
  
Actual results:
1 vcpu.


Expected results:
any number of vcpus you select.

Additional info:
In the gahp config there is a line "+vcpus=1"  This line just appends that after the xml which causes the job to fail.  That should probably be removed.  If you put the xml after the + it might work. But then all jobs have to have the same vcpus.  This is something you should be able to specify with the job.

Comment 1 Benjamin Kreuter 2008-10-21 00:50:06 UTC
This change has been merged upstream.  It is now possible to set the VCPUS for a VM job in the job description file, with the vm_vcpus parameter.

Comment 3 Martin Kudlej 2009-03-17 09:40:26 UTC
Tested on RHEL 5.3 i386 and x86_64 on condor 7.2.2-0.8.el5 ... OK

-->VERIFIED

Comment 5 errata-xmlrpc 2009-04-21 16:18:31 UTC
An advisory has been issued which should help the problem
described in this bug report. This report is therefore being
closed with a resolution of ERRATA. For more information
on therefore solution and/or where to find the updated files,
please follow the link below. You may reopen this bug report
if the solution does not work for you.

http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHEA-2009-0434.html


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.