Red Hat Bugzilla – Bug 465480
Openoffice.org doesn't build with java/javac combination of java from java-1.6.0-openjdk and javac of java-1.5.0-gcj-devel
Last modified: 2008-10-04 13:56:44 EDT
Description of problem: Openoffice.org doesn't build on x86_64 Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): openoffice.org-2.4.1-17.6.fc9 How reproducible: I tried it once - it looks serious. Steps to Reproduce: 1. cd ~/rpmbuild 2. yumdownloader --source openoffice.org 3. TIME="%E" time rpmbuild -ba openoffice.org.spec 2>&1 | tee build.log Actual results: Build failed Expected results: Build succeeded Additional info: In order to satisfy build dependencies, I ran - yum install ant icu java-1.5.0-devel vigra-devel libxml2-devel libxslt-devel neon-devel libcurl-devel libidn-devel pam-devel cups-devel xulrunner-devel libwpd-devel hunspell-devel unixODBC-devel sane-backends-devel libicu-devel perl-Archive-Zip gtk2-devel gnome-vfs2-devel evolution-data-server-devel libtextcat-devel nss-devel gstreamer-devel gstreamer-plugins-base-devel hyphen-devel - although there are bound to be other dependencies that I already had installed. I've got a custom build environment - see attached .rpmmacros and .rpmrc I've gzipped the build log but it's 1.5MB compressed, 15.2MB uncompressed. I will attach it if more information is needed.
Created attachment 319371 [details] rpmrc
Created attachment 319372 [details] rpmmacros
Between "Steps to Reproduce" steps 2 and 3 above insert rpm -i openoffice.org-2.4.1-17.6.fc9.src.rpm cd openoffice.org-2.4.1
Well, it definitely *does* build on x86_64 on vanilla F9, seeing as I build it all the time :-), so you'll have to show me your specific failure.
Created attachment 319383 [details] gzipped build log
Your "java" is probably openjdk and your "javac" is probably "ecj". Mixing them doesn't work in 2.4.1, they both have to match, i.e. both from java-1.5.0-gcj or both from java-1.6.0-openjdk I think I fixed this upstream for 3.0
My /root/install.log contains Installing java-1.6.0-openjdk-1.6.0.0-0.10.b09.fc9.x86_64 ... Installing java-1.5.0-gcj-1.5.0.0-21.fc9.x86_64 so they were installation choices - not mine. I agree that one or the other should be chosen - why this isn't the case for the F9 x86_64 install DVD is curious. I installed java-1.6.0-openjdk-devel and galternatives shows that my system is now using java-1.6.0-openjdk-devel's version. I'll give it a try tomorrow and see how it goes.
Yep. Build complete.