Spec URL: http://hg.et.redhat.com/misc/fedora-mingw--devel/?cmd=manifest;manifest=82a0662b5376fe1a90612ed85628670c902a43d3;path=/gdbm/ SRPM URL: http://www.annexia.org/tmp/mingw/fedora-9/src/SRPMS/mingw32-gdbm-1.8.0-1.fc9.src.rpm Description: MinGW port of GNU database routines Approved MinGW packaging guidelines are here: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/MinGW I sent the MinGW-related patch upstream. However it looks to me like upstream for this project is dead. A few things require this package, like OCaml & Python.
Spec URL: http://hg.et.redhat.com/cgi-bin/hg-misc.cgi/fedora-mingw--devel/file/tip/gdbm/mingw32-gdbm.spec SRPM URL: http://www.annexia.org/tmp/mingw/fedora-10/src/SRPMS/mingw32-gdbm-1.8.0-1.fc10.src.rpm
I will take this one
$ rpmlint Download/mingw32-gdbm-1.8.0-1.fc10.src.rpm 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. $ rpmlint rpmbuild/RPMS/noarch/mingw32-gdbm-1.8.0-1.fc10.noarch.rpm mingw32-gdbm.noarch: W: no-documentation mingw32-gdbm.noarch: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/include/gdbm.h mingw32-gdbm.noarch: E: script-without-shebang /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/lib/libgdbm.la mingw32-gdbm.noarch: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/lib/libgdbm.dll.a mingw32-gdbm.noarch: W: spurious-executable-perm /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/lib/libgdbm.dll.a mingw32-gdbm.noarch: E: arch-independent-package-contains-binary-or-object /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/lib/libgdbm.dll.a mingw32-gdbm.noarch: W: non-standard-dir-in-usr i686-pc-mingw32 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 2 errors, 5 warnings. Looks like false positives, because of the cross compiler nature of the package.
MUST: * package must match the upstream source cd543862287f55ad66e62cc9d82cc906 gdbm-1.8.0.tar.gz (upstream) cd543862287f55ad66e62cc9d82cc906 gdbm-1.8.0.tar.gz (srpm) * package is named appropriately mingw32-* * it is legal for Fedora to distribute this * license field matches the actual license. * license is open source-compatible. * specfile name matches %{name} * summary and description fine * correct buildroot * %{?dist} is used * no license text included in package * package meets FHS (http://www.pathname.com/fhs/) * changelog format fine * Packager, Vendor ,Distribution tag not used * License used and not Copyright * Summary tag does not end in a period * specfile is legible * package successfully compiles and builds on at least x86 * make sure lines are <= 80 characters * specfile written in American English * no -doc sub-package necessary * /sbin/ldconfig used in packages containing libraries. no native libs * GUI app, has .desktop file and uses desktop-file-install to install it. not a gui app * header files goes into -devel sub-package. no native header files * *.so goes into -devel sub-package. no *.so files * macros used appropriately and consistently * no %makeinstall * install section must begin with rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT or %{buildroot} * The spec file handles locales properly (%find_lang ) no locales * split Requires(pre,post) into two separate lines * package not relocatable * package contains code * package owns all directories and files * no %files duplicates * %defattrs present * %clean present * %doc files do not affect runtime * packages is following the MinGW guidelines (http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/MinGW) APPROVED
New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: mingw32-gdbm Short Description: MinGW port of GNU database routines Owners: rjones berrange lfarkas Branches: EL-5 F-10 InitialCC:
cvs done.
mingw32-gdbm-1.8.0-1.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/mingw32-gdbm-1.8.0-1.fc10
mingw32-gdbm-1.8.0-1.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.