Bug 469051 - Cloning errata is very slow
Summary: Cloning errata is very slow
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED WONTFIX
Alias: None
Product: Red Hat Satellite 5
Classification: Red Hat
Component: Server
Version: 511
Hardware: All
OS: Linux
medium
medium
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: Clifford Perry
QA Contact: Red Hat Satellite QA List
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On:
Blocks: 462714 479461
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2008-10-29 17:40 UTC by Anthony Green
Modified: 2014-05-09 10:20 UTC (History)
3 users (show)

Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2014-05-09 10:20:56 UTC
Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:

Attachments (Terms of Use)


Links
System ID Private Priority Status Summary Last Updated
Red Hat Bugzilla 1012468 1 None None None 2021-01-20 06:05:38 UTC

Internal Links: 1012468

Description Anthony Green 2008-10-29 17:40:11 UTC 
Description of problem:
Cloning errata is very very slow.

From IRC:
(09:48:37 AM) mike: green: heh, its taking a long time in a method called:
(09:48:43 AM) mike: cloneErrataFast()
(09:49:06 AM) mike: green: yeah, something isnt right with this, taking way too long.

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
I found this on 5.1.1.  I haven't tested any other release.

How reproducible:
Always

Steps to Reproduce:
1.Clone the 32-bit x86 RHEL 5 channel with 0 errata
2.Clone all of the 600+ errata into the cloned channel
3.Wait
  
Actual results:
It works, but takes between 30 and 90 minutes (I left my computer at 30min when it was still working.  It was finished when I returned at 90min).

Expected results:


Additional info:
Comment 1 Mike McCune 2008-10-29 17:42:37 UTC 
I saw this as well.  It took over 60 minutes on rlx-1-16 to clone 600 errata.
Comment 7 Clifford Perry 2014-05-09 10:20:56 UTC 
We have not addressed this specific bug for over 4 years. This bug was reported as either Satellite 5.0 or 5.1, both of which have now End of Life and not supported. I am closing out as wontfix to clear from backlog. 

Please re-open if you disagree and wish further review.

Cliff
Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.