Hide Forgot
Spec URL: http://mef.fedorapeople.org/packages/java-libraries/swingx.spec SRPM URL: http://mef.fedorapeople.org/packages/java-libraries/swingx-0.9.4-1.src.rpm Description: SwingX contains a collection of powerful, useful, and just plain fun Swing components. Each of the Swing components have been extended, providing data-aware functionality out of the box. New useful components have been created like the JXDatePicker, JXTaskPane, and JXImagePanel.
Updated spec, now builds properly in mock and is rpmlint clean. http://mef.fedorapeople.org/packages/java-libraries/swingx.spec http://mef.fedorapeople.org/packages/java-libraries/swingx-0.9.4-2.src.rpm
Looks good so far. Only thing I see is that you didn't comment on the patches within the SPEC file. Could you please add a comment wether you filed a bug with upstream already or if this patches are Fedora specific. Also see https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#All_patches_should_have_an_upstream_bug_link_or_comment Also I'll be taking this bug for review now.
Okay, I've added comments to all of the patches (none of which look like they're going away soon) and also updated the summary based on the recent discussion on fedora-devel list. http://mef.fedorapeople.org/packages/java-libraries/swingx.spec http://mef.fedorapeople.org/packages/java-libraries/swingx-0.9.4-4.src.rpm
So here are my final findings after having a thorough look onto the package and the spec: [+] rpmlint output is OK swingx.noarch: W: non-conffile-in-etc /etc/maven/fragments/swingx can be ignored because it actually is set as %config in the spec file [+] package is named correctly [+] matches upstream source md5 [-] meets the packaging guidelines: BuildRoot tag is not correct as it does not include %{release}: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#BuildRoot_tag [+] License in SPEC matches actual license and is acceptable for Fedora [+] If license is included it should be in %doc [+] successfully compiles in mock [+] build dependencies are in BuildRequires [+] file permissions are correct [+] javadoc Subpackage exists One note on style: You switch between ${RPM_BUILD_ROOT} and $RPM_BUILD_ROOT in %install which is not considered to be good style I believe. But actually this is not an issue. After you fixed that tiny issues I'll most likely approve your package :)
Fixed (hopefully!) -- I also added the dist to the version: http://mef.fedorapeople.org/packages/java-libraries/swingx.spec http://mef.fedorapeople.org/packages/java-libraries/swingx-0.9.4-5.fc10.src.rpm Sorry for the delay.
APPROVED. You can now go ahead and request a CVS module.
New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: swingx Short Description: A collection of Swing components Owners: mef Branches: F-9 F-10 InitialCC:
cvs done.
swingx-0.9.4-5.fc9 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 9. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/swingx-0.9.4-5.fc9
swingx-0.9.4-5.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/swingx-0.9.4-5.fc10
swingx-0.9.4-5.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update swingx'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F10/FEDORA-2008-11159
swingx-0.9.4-5.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing-newkey update swingx'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F9/FEDORA-2008-11179
swingx-0.9.4-5.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
swingx-0.9.4-5.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.