Bug 472737 (CVE-2008-5285) - CVE-2008-5285 wireshark: DoS (infinite loop) in SMTP dissector via large SMTP request
Summary: CVE-2008-5285 wireshark: DoS (infinite loop) in SMTP dissector via large SMTP...
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED ERRATA
Alias: CVE-2008-5285
Product: Security Response
Classification: Other
Component: vulnerability
Version: unspecified
Hardware: All
OS: Linux
low
low
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: Red Hat Product Security
QA Contact:
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On: 486548 486549 486550 486551 486552 833990
Blocks:
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2008-11-24 09:41 UTC by Jan Lieskovsky
Modified: 2019-09-29 12:27 UTC (History)
2 users (show)

Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2009-03-05 07:48:40 UTC


Attachments (Terms of Use)


Links
System ID Priority Status Summary Last Updated
Red Hat Product Errata RHSA-2009:0313 normal SHIPPED_LIVE Moderate: wireshark security update 2009-03-04 19:41:33 UTC

Description Jan Lieskovsky 2008-11-24 09:41:56 UTC
A security flaw was found in the Wireshark's SMTP dissector -- routines for SMTP packet disassembly. A remote attacker could use this flaw to cause a denial of service (infinite loop) via sending a large SMTP request to port 25.

References:
http://packetstormsecurity.org/0811-advisories/wireshark104-dos.txt
http://www.securityfocus.com/archive/1/498562/30/0/threaded
http://www.nabble.com/-SVRT-04-08--Vulnerability-in-WireShark-1.0.4-for-DoS-Attack-td20640164.html

Proposed upstream patches:
http://anonsvn.wireshark.org/viewvc/trunk/epan/dissectors/packet-smtp.c?r1=24989&r2=24988&pathrev=24989&view=patch
http://anonsvn.wireshark.org/viewvc/trunk/epan/dissectors/packet-smtp.c?r1=24994&r2=24993&pathrev=24994&view=patch

Comment 1 Jan Lieskovsky 2008-12-02 12:52:04 UTC
The Red Hat Security Response Team has rated this issue as having low security
impact, a future update may address this flaw. More information regarding
issue severity can be found here:

http://www.redhat.com/security/updates/classification/

Comment 4 Red Hat Product Security 2009-03-05 07:48:40 UTC
This issue was addressed in:

Red Hat Enterprise Linux:
  http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2009-0313.html


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.