Note: This bug is displayed in read-only format because the product is no longer active in Red Hat Bugzilla.

Bug 472885

Summary:	rps-10 fence agent does not perform default reboot action
Product:	[Retired] Red Hat Cluster Suite	Reporter:	Jan Friesse <jfriesse>
Component:	fence	Assignee:	Jim Parsons <jparsons>
Status:	CLOSED ERRATA	QA Contact:	Cluster QE <mspqa-list>
Severity:	low	Docs Contact:
Priority:	low
Version:	4	CC:	cfeist, cluster-maint, djansa, edamato, jfriesse
Target Milestone:	---
Target Release:	---
Hardware:	All
OS:	Linux
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version:		Doc Type:	Bug Fix
Doc Text:		Story Points:	---
Clone Of:		Environment:
Last Closed:	2009-05-18 21:16:12 UTC	Type:	---
Regression:	---	Mount Type:	---
Documentation:	---	CRM:
Verified Versions:		Category:	---
oVirt Team:	---	RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team:	---	Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:
Bug Depends On:	322291
Bug Blocks:

Description Jan Friesse 2008-11-25 12:45:43 UTC

+++ This bug was initially created as a clone of Bug #322291 +++

Description of problem:

The rps-10 fence agent does not perform the default reboot action when run.  If
no "option" attribute is specified in the <fencedevice> node of the cluster
configuration then the error "failed: operation must be 'on', 'off', or 'reboot'
is returned when the agent runs.

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):

fence_rps10 2.0.64

--- Additional comment from jfriesse on 2008-11-25 06:07:58 EDT ---

Created an attachment (id=324589)
Patch fixing this bug.

This patch long lives in master/STABLE2 branch, but never arrive to RHEL5. It's originally created by Lon Hohberger.

Comment 3 errata-xmlrpc 2009-05-18 21:16:12 UTC

An advisory has been issued which should help the problem
described in this bug report. This report is therefore being
closed with a resolution of ERRATA. For more information
on therefore solution and/or where to find the updated files,
please follow the link below. You may reopen this bug report
if the solution does not work for you.

http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2009-1050.html