Could there possibly be an updated rolled?
I'm assigning this to romal, he's the current owner.
Isn't it a problem that there is a package in EPEL which is not maintained in Rawhide? [root@hubmaier ~]# cat /etc/fedora-release Fedora release 10.90 (Rawhide) [root@hubmaier ~]# yum list \*otrs\* Loaded plugins: allowdowngrade, changelog, downloadonly, protectbase, refresh- : packagekit, remove-with-leaves, security, versionlock Excluding Packages in global exclude list Finished Excluding Packages from Adobe Systems Incorporated Finished Reading version lock configuration 0 packages excluded due to repository protections Error: No matching Packages to list [root@hubmaier ~]#
I didn't yet notice that. But imho you are right. Weren't all packages supposed to be part of rawhide when they are rolled into EPEL, not the other way round?
There are activities going on to bring otrs back to rawhide. I think it should be included in Fedora.
Hi, I invested some time this weekend to understand the old specfiles and did some first fixes to upgrade ist to 2.3. Any help / patches are welcome. cu romal
(In reply to comment #5) > Hi, > > I invested some time this weekend to understand the old specfiles and did some > first fixes to upgrade ist to 2.3. > > Any help / patches are welcome. Count me in. I need to setup a prototype of our current system (IRM) migrated/switched to OTRS. Any specific thing you'd like me to look at?
*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 607873 ***