Bug 474084 - FC10 install fails resolving dependancies
Summary: FC10 install fails resolving dependancies
Alias: None
Product: Fedora
Classification: Fedora
Component: yum
Version: rawhide
Hardware: i386
OS: Linux
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: Seth Vidal
QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance
Whiteboard: anaconda_trace_hash:a5ec0c1829b040467...
Depends On:
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
Reported: 2008-12-02 02:44 UTC by Chris Elmquist
Modified: 2014-01-21 23:07 UTC (History)
5 users (show)

Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Clone Of:
Last Closed: 2009-01-14 15:31:29 UTC
Type: ---

Attachments (Terms of Use)
Attached traceback automatically from anaconda. (61.56 KB, text/plain)
2008-12-02 02:44 UTC, Chris Elmquist
no flags Details

Description Chris Elmquist 2008-12-02 02:44:36 UTC
This bug was filed automatically by anaconda.

Comment 1 Chris Elmquist 2008-12-02 02:44:41 UTC
Created attachment 325326 [details]
Attached traceback automatically from anaconda.

Comment 2 Chris Elmquist 2008-12-02 03:16:35 UTC
Numerous attempts to install FC10 on this system always result
in this failure from anaconda.  I have tried directly from
DVD .iso, from network .iso, network via URL to a mirror site,
blows up the same way every time.

This system was previously running FC9 without issue.  I tried to
upgrade and that resulted in hangs, lockups and finally the inability
to complete the install due to a missing dblib of some sort which
RPM and yum needed to finish the install.

So, I have gone back to trying to install FC10 fresh-- wiped
the disk-- yet I continue to encounter these python dumps from

Very frusterating.  This is not what I have come to expect from the
Fedora project.

Comment 3 James Antill 2008-12-02 16:22:08 UTC
Traceback (most recent call first):
  File "/usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/yum/sqlitesack.py", line 237, in returnPrco
    if isinstance(self.prco[prcotype], tuple):
TypeError: _share_data() takes exactly 1 argument (2 given)

...awesome, not only is _share_data() not called on that line, but AFAICS it isn't called with two arguments anywhere in that file.
 Did you check the media?

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.