Description of problem: Some utilities (when executed without parameters) print the usage message which contains a different name than the name of the binary. The difference is '_' versus '-'. Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): ecryptfs-utils-56-8.el5 How reproducible: always Steps to Reproduce: Run any of the following utilities and the '_' vs. '-' problem will appear. 1. /usr/bin/ecryptfs-wrap-passphrase 2. /usr/bin/ecryptfs-unwrap-passphrase 3. /usr/bin/ecryptfs-rewrap-passphrase 4. /usr/bin/ecryptfs-insert-wrapped-passphrase-into-keyring Actual results: The name of the binary and the name in the usage message is different. Expected results: The name of the binary and the name in the usage message is the same. Additional info:
this is fixed since version 63 it will be fixed by rebase (#482834) or patch backported from this commit http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/mhalcrow/ecryptfs-utils.git;a=commit;h=49044f8d8e870d91deecf1fa2d1a2ff97f278056
An advisory has been issued which should help the problem described in this bug report. This report is therefore being closed with a resolution of ERRATA. For more information on therefore solution and/or where to find the updated files, please follow the link below. You may reopen this bug report if the solution does not work for you. http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2009-1307.html