Bug 476570 - new and versioned tgt releases now available
new and versioned tgt releases now available
Status: CLOSED RAWHIDE
Product: Fedora
Classification: Fedora
Component: scsi-target-utils (Show other bugs)
rawhide
All Linux
low Severity low
: ---
: ---
Assigned To: Mike Christie
Fedora Extras Quality Assurance
:
Depends On:
Blocks:
  Show dependency treegraph
 
Reported: 2008-12-15 14:26 EST by Jarod Wilson
Modified: 2008-12-16 16:45 EST (History)
2 users (show)

See Also:
Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2008-12-16 16:45:11 EST
Type: ---
Regression: ---
Mount Type: ---
Documentation: ---
CRM:
Verified Versions:
Category: ---
oVirt Team: ---
RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: ---


Attachments (Terms of Use)

  None (edit)
Description Jarod Wilson 2008-12-15 14:26:22 EST
Description of problem:
Just noticed the latest scsi-target-utils is still tgt snapshot-based, while there have been a few tgt releases now, the current one being 0.9.2, which I've built locally just fine (in fact, if so desired, I could just commit the changes to rawhide cvs...).

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
scsi-target-utils-6.20080805snap.fc11

Expected results:
scsi-target-utils-0.9.2-1.fc11
Comment 1 Terje Røsten 2008-12-15 14:33:07 EST
Current release is 
scsi-target-utils-0.0-6.20080805snap
not
scsi-target-utils-6.20080805snap

scsi-target-utils-0.9.2-1.fc11 > scsi-target-utils-0.0-6.20080805snap

oo the update is fine in that sense. 

Ok from me. 

Do you seen against the update, Mike?
Comment 2 Jarod Wilson 2008-12-15 15:08:14 EST
(In reply to comment #1)
> Current release is 
> scsi-target-utils-0.0-6.20080805snap
> not
> scsi-target-utils-6.20080805snap

Whoops, sorry, cut-n-paste error from rpm -qi output, left out the Version portion. So yes, upgrading to a 0.9.2-1.fc11 package does actually work as expected.
Comment 3 Terje Røsten 2008-12-16 16:17:07 EST
Just did a quick build, go ahead and commit Jarod :-)
Comment 4 Jarod Wilson 2008-12-16 16:31:23 EST
Done. Also tacked on one patch from upstream git to restore a bind command that was apparently accidentally dropped at some point. Build in progress...
Comment 5 Jarod Wilson 2008-12-16 16:45:11 EST
...and once I actually got everything properly into cvs and the lookaside, build actually went off fine.

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.