Bug 477707 - Internal compiler error building AOT bits for eclipse-emf
Internal compiler error building AOT bits for eclipse-emf
Product: Fedora
Classification: Fedora
Component: java-1.5.0-gcj (Show other bugs)
All Linux
low Severity high
: ---
: ---
Assigned To: Andrew Haley
Fedora Extras Quality Assurance
Depends On:
  Show dependency treegraph
Reported: 2008-12-22 19:10 EST by Mat Booth
Modified: 2010-12-05 02:03 EST (History)
2 users (show)

See Also:
Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of:
Last Closed: 2010-12-05 02:03:57 EST
Type: ---
Regression: ---
Mount Type: ---
Documentation: ---
Verified Versions:
Category: ---
oVirt Team: ---
RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: ---

Attachments (Terms of Use)
backtrace (4.64 KB, text/plain)
2008-12-22 19:11 EST, Mat Booth
no flags Details
buildlog (506.46 KB, text/plain)
2008-12-22 19:16 EST, Mat Booth
no flags Details

  None (edit)
Description Mat Booth 2008-12-22 19:10:18 EST
Description of problem:
If I enable gcj-aot compiling on my eclipse-emf package, I get an internal compiler error.

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):

How reproducible:
Every time.

Steps to Reproduce:
The error is caused building the following srpm:
Actual results:
See attached backtrace.

Additional info:
I have only tried this on F10 as I have no rawhide box available.
See attached buildlog.
Comment 1 Mat Booth 2008-12-22 19:11:12 EST
Created attachment 327712 [details]
Comment 2 Mat Booth 2008-12-22 19:16:02 EST
Created attachment 327715 [details]
Comment 3 Alexander Kurtakov 2009-08-18 05:19:28 EDT
There is no reason for emf to have gcj support. 
Do you mind closing the bug?
Comment 4 Mat Booth 2009-08-18 06:33:24 EDT
(In reply to comment #3)
> Mat,
> There is no reason for emf to have gcj support. 
> Do you mind closing the bug?  

It wasn't EMF I was worried about when I reported this, since to me it looked like a bug in GCJ that could hit other products using AOT compilation.

I do not know enough about it to know whether anyone should be concerned about this bug or whether it's even worth fixing at all, so I won't close this myself; I would much rather defer that decision to the GCJ maintainer.
Comment 5 Andrew Haley 2009-08-18 06:39:11 EDT
I think this should be fixed, since ICEs are always compiler bugs.

I think this needs to be reopened as a gcc bug upstream.
Comment 6 Mat Booth 2009-08-18 06:49:04 EDT
(In reply to comment #5)
> I think this should be fixed, since ICEs are always compiler bugs.
> I think this needs to be reopened as a gcc bug upstream.  

I see. I will see if this bug still exists in Rawhide and then do that.

Thanks for the feedback.
Comment 7 Mat Booth 2009-09-01 18:43:27 EDT
This bug is still exhibiting in Rawhide, I've reported it upstream: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41221
Comment 8 Bug Zapper 2009-11-16 04:44:21 EST
This bug appears to have been reported against 'rawhide' during the Fedora 12 development cycle.
Changing version to '12'.

More information and reason for this action is here:
Comment 9 Bug Zapper 2010-11-04 07:35:56 EDT
This message is a reminder that Fedora 12 is nearing its end of life.
Approximately 30 (thirty) days from now Fedora will stop maintaining
and issuing updates for Fedora 12.  It is Fedora's policy to close all
bug reports from releases that are no longer maintained.  At that time
this bug will be closed as WONTFIX if it remains open with a Fedora 
'version' of '12'.

Package Maintainer: If you wish for this bug to remain open because you
plan to fix it in a currently maintained version, simply change the 'version' 
to a later Fedora version prior to Fedora 12's end of life.

Bug Reporter: Thank you for reporting this issue and we are sorry that 
we may not be able to fix it before Fedora 12 is end of life.  If you 
would still like to see this bug fixed and are able to reproduce it 
against a later version of Fedora please change the 'version' of this 
bug to the applicable version.  If you are unable to change the version, 
please add a comment here and someone will do it for you.

Although we aim to fix as many bugs as possible during every release's 
lifetime, sometimes those efforts are overtaken by events.  Often a 
more recent Fedora release includes newer upstream software that fixes 
bugs or makes them obsolete.

The process we are following is described here: 
Comment 10 Bug Zapper 2010-12-05 02:03:57 EST
Fedora 12 changed to end-of-life (EOL) status on 2010-12-02. Fedora 12 is 
no longer maintained, which means that it will not receive any further 
security or bug fix updates. As a result we are closing this bug.

If you can reproduce this bug against a currently maintained version of 
Fedora please feel free to reopen this bug against that version.

Thank you for reporting this bug and we are sorry it could not be fixed.

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.