Spec URL: http://people.sugarlabs.org/~alsroot/RPM/SPECS/sugar-tamtam-common.spec SRPM URL: http://people.sugarlabs.org/~alsroot/RPM/SRPMS/sugar-tamtam-common-52-1.20081229.fc10.src.rpm Description: TamTam is a suite of four music and sound related activities for theSugar. TamTam is written in python with some C functions for speed-critical services.The audio engine for TamTam is Csound. rpmlint claims for right group, but other sugar activities also use Sugar/Activities group COPYING.txt says GPLv3 but TamTam*.activity/activity/activity.info says GPLv2+, so I use GPLv2+ in spec package demands sugar* and olpcsound packages from updates-testing repo but current olpcsound has unmets, thus I built sugar*.src.rpm from updates-testing and used them from local repo
(In reply to comment #0) > COPYING.txt says GPLv3 but TamTam*.activity/activity/activity.info says GPLv2+, > so I use GPLv2+ in spec What did the upstream say about this?
(In reply to comment #1) > (In reply to comment #0) > > COPYING.txt says GPLv3 but TamTam*.activity/activity/activity.info says GPLv2+, > > so I use GPLv2+ in spec > > What did the upstream say about this? the right licence is GPLv3+, now I'm waiting for authors' decision about merging branch(my packages based on) to trunk, after that I'm going re-upload all TamTam packages
since all honey activities should be installed from ASLO and distros provide only http://wiki.sugarlabs.org/go/Development_Team/Sugar_Platform/0.84 I'm closing this bug