Hide Forgot
Spec URL: http://ispbrasil.com.br/dlfcn/mingw32-dlfcn.spec SRPM URL: http://ispbrasil.com.br/dlfcn/mingw32-dlfcn-r11-1.fc10.src.rpm Description: This library implements a wrapper for dlfcn, as specified in POSIX and SUS, around the dynamic link library functions found in the Windows API. (dlopen dlclose dlsym dlerror)
Itamar, can you try making a Koji scratch-build of this please. It will make it easier to review. You will need to do something like: koji build --scratch dist-f11 mingw32-dlfcn-r11-1.fc10.src.rpm (I'm not exactly sure if that is the correct command, and upgraded my machine yesterday so Koji is now broken for me, so please check it).
I imported this package into the Fedora MinGW temporary repository because I want to have other packages depend on it. Here is an updated package: Spec URL: http://hg.et.redhat.com/cgi-bin/hg-misc.cgi/fedora-mingw--devel/file/tip/dlfcn/mingw32-dlfcn.spec SRPM URL: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/getfile?taskID=1049268&name=mingw32-dlfcn-0.1-0.2.r11.fc11.src.rpm * Tue Jan 13 2009 Richard W.M. Jones <rjones@redhat.com> - 0.1-0.2.r11 - Import into fedora-mingw temporary repository because there are packages which will depend on this. - Fix the version/release according to packaging guidelines. - Tidy up the spec file. - Use dos2unix and keep the timestamps. Here is a successful Koji scratch build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1049267 rpmlint says: mingw32-dlfcn.noarch: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/lib/libdl.dll.a mingw32-dlfcn.noarch: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/include/dlfcn.h mingw32-dlfcn.noarch: E: arch-independent-package-contains-binary-or-object /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/lib/libdl.dll.a mingw32-dlfcn.noarch: W: non-standard-dir-in-usr i686-pc-mingw32 2 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 1 errors, 3 warnings. These are all errors which can be ignored for MinGW packages.
Doesn't need to be in NEEDINFO any more.
"Fix it with sed in the %prep section: %{__sed} -i 's/\r//' src/somefile -- DONT use dos2unix, that can cause build fail on FC3. " Well you should stick to the guidelines even if FC3 is long dead. Pass %{?_smp_mflags} to make unless you have a reason not to do so. Will do a formal review later this week (limited time).
(In reply to comment #4) > "Fix it with sed in the %prep section: %{__sed} -i 's/\r//' src/somefile -- > DONT use dos2unix, that can cause build fail on FC3. " > > Well you should stick to the guidelines even if FC3 is long dead. I'm missing the context here. Was the above in reply to something? > Pass %{?_smp_mflags} to make unless you have a reason not to do so. I agree, this should be added. > Will do a formal review later this week (limited time). Thanks.
(In reply to comment #5) > (In reply to comment #4) > > "Fix it with sed in the %prep section: %{__sed} -i 's/\r//' src/somefile -- > > DONT use dos2unix, that can cause build fail on FC3. " > > > > Well you should stick to the guidelines even if FC3 is long dead. > > I'm missing the context here. Was the above in reply to something? Yeah forgot to quote the context: "- Use dos2unix and keep the timestamps." dos2unix shouldn't be used, use sed instead. (see above quote from the guidelines)
dos2unix issue raised with FPC: https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-packaging/2009-January/msg00066.html Here's an updated package which reverts the dos2unix change and should fix everything else: Spec URL: http://hg.et.redhat.com/cgi-bin/hg-misc.cgi/fedora-mingw--devel/file/tip/dlfcn/mingw32-dlfcn.spec SRPM URL: http://www.annexia.org/tmp/mingw/fedora-10/src/SRPMS/mingw32-dlfcn-0-0.3.r11.fc10.src.rpm * Wed Jan 14 2009 Richard W.M. Jones <rjones@redhat.com> - 0-0.3.r11 - Use Version 0 (https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-packaging/2009-January/msg00064.html) - Revert use of dos2unix for now (https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-packaging/2009-January/msg00066.html) - Use _smp_mflags.
REVIEW: [+] = OK [-] = NOT OK [1] = SEE COMMENTS [?] = WTF? =========================== [+] source files match upstream: sha1: 0b691107a23554d927987d4ddfca6e84dfd85313 [+] package meets naming and versioning guidelines. [+] specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently. [+] dist tag is present. [+] build root is correct. [+] license field matches the actual license. [+] license is open source-compatible. LGPLv2+ [+] license text included in package. [+] latest version is being packaged. [+] BuildRequires are proper. [+] compiler flags are appropriate. [+] %clean is present. [+] package builds in koji. http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1058151 [+] package installs properly. [1] rpmlint is silent. [+] final provides and requires are sane [+] no shared libraries are added to the regular linker search paths. [+] doesn't own any directories it shouldn't. [+] no duplicates in %files. [+] file permissions are appropriate. [+] no scriptlets present. [+] code, not content. [+] documentation is small, so no -docs subpackage is necessary. [+] %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package. [2] no headers. [+] no pkgconfig files. [+] no libtool .la droppings. ============================ COMMENTS 1: not silent. mingw32-dlfcn.noarch: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/lib/libdl.dll.a mingw32-dlfcn.noarch: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/include/dlfcn.h mingw32-dlfcn.noarch: E: arch-independent-package-contains-binary-or-object /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/lib/libdl.dll.a mingw32-dlfcn.noarch: W: non-standard-dir-in-usr i686-pc-mingw32 Those are fine thought (package used for cross compiling) 2: header is present, but its fine (cross compile package) ============================ Package looks good => APPROVED
New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: mingw32-dlfcn Short Description: Implements a wrapper for dlfcn (dlopen dlclose dlsym dlerror) Owners: rjones berrange lfarkas Branches: EL-5 F-10 InitialCC:
cvs done.
mingw32-dlfcn-0-0.3.r11.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/mingw32-dlfcn-0-0.3.r11.fc10
mingw32-dlfcn-0-0.3.r11.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.